Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?

By Bart Van Looy, Julie Callaert, Koenraad Debackere. 2006

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a28d9566a6e53e96720a338c557b64e65e254232

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs (2011, neutral): “Van Looy et al. / Research Policy 40 (2011) 553–564 557”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, result): “…to pursue profitable lines of inquiry rather than lines which advance knowledge (Feller, 1990), although other studies cast doubt on the existence of a simple trade-off or displacement effect between technology transfer and traditional academic activities (Van Looy et al., 2006; Rafferty, 2008).”
Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity (2007, background): “Van Looy et al (2006) conclude that patenting researchers at the Catholic University of Leuven publish in rather basic research-orientated journals compared to their non-patenting colleagues.”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, neutral): “…words, both are relatively interchangeable as a merit criterion without negatively affecting a scientific career since patents and publications tend to go hand in hand (Geuna and Nesta 2006) and are even mutually strengthening because inventors publish significantly more (Van Looy et al. 2006).”
Research Output From University–Industry Collaborative Projects (2013, background): “Godin (1996) and van Looy et al. (2006) reinterpreted the categories as (a) applied technology, (b) basic technology, (c) applied science, and (d) basic science; and grouped the first two as technology and the last two as science.”
Impact of public and private research funding on scientific production: The case of nanotechnology (2012, background): “While more public research funds undoubtedly lead to more scientific articles, hence supporting proposition 1 and the work of other scholars (for instance Arora et al., 1998, Zucker et al. 2007), the relationship between private funds and scientific production is inexistent (in contrast with Van Loo”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, neutral): “Both university-level and individual-level analyses show a predominantly positive relationship between faculty quality and involvement in patenting (Coupé, 2003; Geuna and Nesta, 2006; Stephan, 2007; Carayol, 2007; Van Looy et al., 2006; Breschi et al., 2007).”
Heterogeneity of Patenting Activity and Its Implications for Scientific Research (2007, background): “Inventions demanded by the market are typically rather applied and do not necessarily touch academic research frontiers (Trajtenberg et al., 1997).”
Inventing and patenting activities of scientists: in the expectation of money or reputation? (2010, background): “Although there have been concerns that increase in university patenting has challenged the open nature of university research and shifted academic research towards more commercialization, a number of scholars have investigated the relationship between patenting and open dissemination of research res”