A Content and Methodological Review of Self-Advocacy Intervention Studies

By D. Test, Catherine H. Fowler, Denise M. Brewer, Wendy M. Wood. 2005

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fc8f8fbe967718593dc0a540ab7723d2a1a116b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Audrey A. Trainor
2. Ye Sun
3. A. Bruhn
4. Kathleen Lynne Lane
5. Laura A. Owens
6. E. Carter
7. B. Sweden
8. Matthew E. Brock

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. E. Carter
2. A. Bruhn
3. Kathleen Lynne Lane
4. Audrey A. Trainor

In Safety Research

1. E. Carter
2. Audrey A. Trainor
3. Kathleen Lynne Lane
4. A. Bruhn
5. Matthew E. Brock

Citations in the corpus

• Self-Determination Interventions for Students with and at Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Mapping the Knowledge Base (2011, background): “ingfully integrating findings from studies using diverse methodologies, including single-case experimental designs, are needed (e.g., Chard, Ketterlin-Geller, Baker, Doabler, & Apichatabutra, 2009; Test et al., 2005).”
• Self-Determination Prospects of Youth With High-Incidence Disabilities (2010, background): “…(c) know how to translate assessment findings into individualized objectives, and (d) understand how to implement effective intervention strategies that equip youth with disabilities with essential skills and meaningful opportunities to use them (see Algozzine et al., 2001; Test et al., 2005).”