Cognitive Ability, Thinking Dispositions, and Instructional Set as Predictors of Critical Thinking.
By Robyn Macpherson, K. Stanovich. 2007
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ef0ac573a5827210b438cde5168ebd4c1117cc4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
- E. Sosu
- Luís Fernández-Ríos
- K. Hau
- E. Lai
- Keith J. Holyoak
- Irene T. Ho
- Kelly Yee Lai Ku
- Gregory Schraw
In Social Psychology
- E. Sosu
- Luís Fernández-Ríos
- K. Hau
- E. Lai
- Keith J. Holyoak
- Irene T. Ho
- Kelly Yee Lai Ku
- Gregory Schraw
Citations in the corpus
- Standards for the preparation and writing of Psychology review articles (2009, background): “The general objective is to minimise as much as possible slants on selection of information (Bensley, 2008; Macpherson and Stanovich, 2007).”
- Culturally antagonistic memes and the Zika virus: an experimental test (2017, unknown): “This result is more in accord with the view that sees memes as a switch that substitutes identity-protection for truthseeking as the object of rational information processing (Toplak and Stanovich 2003; Stanovich and West 2008; Macpherson and Stanovich 2007).”
- Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, unknown): “…toward biased reasoning in the experiment evaluation paradigms (as well as related paradigms) shows considerable dissociation from cognitive ability (Kardash & Scholes, 1996; Klac-zynski & Gordon, 1996; Klaczynski & Lavallee, 2005; Klaczynski & Robinson, 2000; Macpherson & Stanovich, 2007).”
- The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (2012, background): “See also MacPherson and Stanovich (2007) for specific strategies that can be used to overcome confirmation bias.”
- Integrating direct and inquiry-based instruction in the teaching of critical thinking: an intervention study (2014, methodology): “…and careful in task approach, as measured by Need for Cognition Scale (NCS; Cacioppo and Petty, 1982), and Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience (NEO-PI-R; Costa and McCrae, 1992), to be conceptually and empirically related to good thinking (Halpern 2007; Macpherson and Stanovich 2007).”
- The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (2013, background): “…practice, professional expertise, anxiety, ego-resilience and overcoming cognitive bias in reasoning (El-sayed, Sleem, El-sayed, & Ramada, 2011; Facione et al., 1995; Fahim, Bagherkazemi, & Alemi, 2010; Kwon, Onwuegbuzie, & Alexander, 2007; Macpherson & Stanovich, 2007; West et al., 2008).”
- On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, unknown): “Myside bias, for example, is virtually independent of intelligence (Macpherson & Stanovich, 2007; Sá, Kelley, Ho, & Stanovich, 2005; Stanovich & West, 2007, 2008a, 2008b; Toplak & Stanovich, 2003).”
- Conceptions of Efficiency: Applications in Learning and Problem Solving (2010, background): “Stanovich and colleagues (Macpherson & Stanovich, 2007; Stanovich & West, 1998; West, Toplak, & Stanovich, 2008) have been particularly active in investigating the use of prior information on subsequent likelihood judgments related to reasoning and thinking.”