The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning

By Keith J. Holyoak, Robert G. Morrison. 2012

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciences (2017, background): “see [Hilton, 1990; Lombrozo, 2012; Miller, 2017]), and that when people ask for an explanation “Why P?”, there is an implicit contrast case.”
Handling Model Uncertainty and Multiplicity in Explanations via Model Reconciliation (2018, methodology): “Explanations of this form have been inspired by works like (Lombrozo 2006; 2012; Miller 2017) which identify properties of explanations in terms of selectivity , con-trastiveness and mental modeling of the explainee, and our recent work (Chakraborti et al. 2018) also demonstrated the usefulness of…”
Plan Explanations as Model Reconciliation: Moving Beyond Explanation as Soliloquy (2017, background): “Further, authors in [Lombrozo, 2012] also underline that explanations are “typically contrastive.”
XOC: Explainable Observer-Classifier for Explainable Binary Decisions (2019, background): “Explanations are useful when they enable solving an independent task (Lombrozo, 2012).”
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance (2013, unknown): “In other words, this model holds that the reduction in the resource is not the immediately proximate causal variable, but only indirectly related.”
The Impact Factor Fallacy (2017, background): “However, the argument from ignorance is not always a bad argument (Hahn & Oaksford, 2007, 2012).”
Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict Reactions (2016, unknown): “5) Chemical Science, 6(2), 987-992; 2015”
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition (2013, unknown): “This is again compatible with Evans’s (2007a, 2010b) view that such processing is necessary for hypothetical thought.”
Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review (2013, background): “The moderators of lag and principle presentation might also be considered together to investigate the possibility that case comparisons lead learners to only tentative conclusions (Holyoak, 2012) in preparation for future learning (Bransford & Schwartz, 1999).”
Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving (2015, background): “!) were only a manifestation of the processes underlying non-insightful or analytic problem solving (for recent reviews of research on insight, see Chu & MacGregor, 2011; Fleck, Beeman, & Kounios, 2013; van Steenburgh et al., 2012; Weisberg, 2006a, chapter 6).”