A Social Cognitive View of Career Development and Counseling.

By Robert W. Lent. 2005

459 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ed57800f08aa2230ddaf965d4ae5d4893f3f117

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Big Five Career Theories (2008, background): “Personal goals refer to one’s intention to engage in certain activity or to generate a particular outcome (Lent, 2005).”
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2006, methodology): “We refer readers wishing to more fully understand the theory and research guiding the models to Lent, Brown, and Hackett (1994) and Lent (2005).”
Social Cognitive Career Theory and Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Work (2008, background): “SCCT’s performance model may also be usefully applied in situations in which dissatisfaction is linked to deficient performance (Lent, 2005).”
Models of Workplace Sexual Identity Disclosure and Management (2008, background): “…stigma-based models, Lidderdale and her colleagues (2007) provide an explanation of LGB workers’ sexual identity management choices and behaviors based in a social cognitive psychological theory, specifically Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Bandura, 1986, 1997; Lent, 2005; Lent et al., 2002).”
Predicting Occupational Interests and Choice Aspirations in Portuguese High School Students: A Test of Social Cognitive Career Theory. (2010, background): “Although these basic interest and choice hypotheses have been tested in a host of studies (see Lent, 2005; Rottinghaus, Larson, & Borgen, 2003), a number of research needs remain.”
Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM (2012, background): “Yet, both situational (Paris et al., 1998; Zoldosova & Prokop, 2006) and individual (Nazier, 2010) interest in STEM appears to be significant concepts for advancing science career research as well as critical career theory (Brown & Krane, 2000; Lent, 2000) and deserve further exploration.”
On Conceptualizing and Assessing Social Cognitive Constructs in Career Research: A Measurement Guide (2006, background): “…construct, and the larger social cognitive theory within which it is embedded (Bandura, 1986), have sparked a great deal of research on career behavior over the past 25 years (for recent reviews, see Lent, 2005; Rottinghaus, Larson, & Borgen, 2003; Stajkovic & Luthans, 1998; Swanson & Gore, 2000).”
Career Self-Efficacy Theory: Back to the Future (2006, background): “…to this central issue of a lack of grounding in relevant theory, is that many researchers appear to consider social cognitive career theory (SCCT; Lent, 2005; Lent et al., 1994, 2000) as somehow independent from self-efficacy theory and research, rather than an attempt to expand on and…”
Counseling for Work and RelationshipΨ (2012, background): “Most well known in this regard is social cognitive career theory, which posits that self-efficacy beliefs are central to agency (Lent, 2005; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994; Lent & Fouad, 2011).”