Career Self-Efficacy Theory: Back to the Future

By N. Betz, G. Hackett. 2006

391 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Safety Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed94eee13b3e7e08e0a18e05fec7fa960fc1c8a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. N. Betz
2. Y. Pabian
3. Xiongyi Liu
4. Daniel Spurk
5. A. Abele
6. Miloš Kankaraš
7. J. Suárez‐Álvarez
8. Briana K. Keller

In Safety Research

1. Daniel Spurk
2. A. Abele
3. Y. Pabian
4. Xiongyi Liu
5. N. Betz
6. J. Perry
7. Miloš Kankaraš
8. J. Suárez‐Álvarez

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. A. Abele
2. Daniel Spurk
3. N. Betz

Citations in the corpus

• Relation of Depression and Affectivity to Career Decision Status and Self-Efficacy in College Students (2009, background): “…influential work on career self-efficacy centered on applying Bandura’s (1977) selfefficacy theory in understanding barriers faced by women in obtaining math and science careers, highlighting the impact of internalized gender role expectations (Betz & Hackett, 1981, 2006; Hackett & Betz, 1981).”
• School Engagement as a Mediator of Academic Performance Among Urban Youth: The Role of Career Preparation, Parental Career Support, and Teacher Support (2010, background): “This missing gap of research is somewhat surprising because career self-efficacy is such a dominant force (Betz & Hackett, 2006).”
• Assessment framework of the OECD Study on Social and Emotional Skills (2019, background): “Self-efficacy is also an essential determinant of career choice (Betz and Hackett, 2006[152]; Betz, 2000[153]), job attitudes (Saks, 1993[154]), training proficiency (Martocchio and Judge, 1997[155]) and job performance (Stajkovic and Luthans, 1998[156]; Lunenberg, 2011[157]).”
• Who Earns More and Why? A Multiple Mediation Model from Personality to Salary (2011, methodology): “According to socio-cognitive theorizing (Bandura 1986, see also Betz and Hackett 2006 ) individuals with high self-efficacy beliefs set higher goals for themselves, put in more effort, and persist longer on a difficult task.”
• Career Self-Efficacy: Exemplary Recent Research and Emerging Directions (2007, background): “The central concepts of the theory are behavior-domain-specific, so measures must be developed to assess the behaviors of interest (see Betz & Hackett, 2006; Lent & Brown, 2006).”
• The Career Futures Inventory–Revised (2012, background): “Bandura’s (1977) self-efficacy concept has inspired vibrant programs of vocational research and practice (Betz & Hackett, 2006).”
• Feeling the Threat (2014, neutral): “As Betz and Hackett (2006) have noted, there is an abundance of research on the consequences of self-efficacy but less on 152 Journal of Career Development 41(2) by guest on December 3, 2014jcd.sagepub.comDownloaded from inputs.”
• Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediation Effect of Self-Regulation (2013, background): “Scholars argue that vocational choice is a complex process requiring a high sense of self-efficacy (Bryant 2007; Schjoedt and Shaver 2007; Betz and Hackett 2006).”
• The Role of Parental Influences on Young Adolescents' Career Development (2008, background): “Given the numerous calls to understand the relational aspects of vocational development (Blustein, 2001b; Flum, 2001), and to more fully examine the tenets of social cognitive career theory (Betz & Hackett, 2006), it seems pertinent to study family influences on the CDMSE of younger adolescents.”