Complementary Resources and the Exploitation of Technological Innovations

By David R. King, Jeffrey G. Covin, Harvey Hegarty. 2003

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e4795a7431b7c84b06ae020ed6e6d45883314b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Meta-analyses of Post-acquisition Performance: Indications of Unidentified Moderators (2004, background): “…sufﬁcient for the present meta-analyses, both theory and initial empirical results suggest that complementary resources may help explain observed acquisition activity and predict post-acquisition performance (Barney, 1988; Capron et al ., 1998; Capron and Pistre, 2002; King et al ., 2003).”
Performance Implications of Firm Resource Interactions in the Acquisition of R&D-Intensive Firms (2008, methodology): “Because firms that fail to take advantage of investment opportunities risk being unable to make comparable investments later (Hill and Rotharmel 2003), the result is a dilemma where firms can either risk obsolescence and loss of market share (King et al. 2003) or invest in R&D, where it is estimated”
Effects of Firm R&D Investment and Environment on Acquisition Likelihood* (2006, unknown): “As such, R&D investments can enable firms to cope with the rapid pace of technological change (King et al., 2003).”
Strategic alliance-based sourcing and market performance: evidence from foreign firms operating in China (2005, background): “Journal of International Business Studies”
Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: the mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration (2007, background): “Hence we posit that access to complementary capabilities (Harrison et al., 2001; King et al., 2003) will mediate the effect of cultural differences on the post-acquisition capability transfer.”