Beyond Retribution: Conceptualizing Restorative Justice and Exploring its Determinants

By T. Okimoto, Michael Wenzel, Norman T. Feather. 2009

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d77c1ad6bece1e620b8b7548480110d6d7b993d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Law

1. Ryan Fehr
2. Norman T. Feather

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Michele J. Gelfand
2. Norman T. Feather

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Okimoto
2. Michael Wenzel
3. Ryan Fehr
4. Michele J. Gelfand
5. Brian C. Holtz
6. M. Platow
7. Norman T. Feather
8. C. Harold

Citations in the corpus

• The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work (2012, background): “We define restorative justice values as a shared belief in the importance of resolving conflict multilaterally through the inclusion of victims, offenders, and all other relevant stakeholders (Goodstein & Butterfield, 2010; Okimoto et al., 2009).”
• Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice (2010, methodology): “Based on previous research (Okimoto & Wenzel, 2008; Okimoto et al., 2009), levels of endorsement of a restorative (a¼ .78) and a retributive justice notion (a¼ .88) were measured by six items each (see Appendix).”
• Interpersonal Justice and Deviance (2013, background): “This article answers calls for research to investigate the role of employee values in shaping behavioral responses to perceived justice (Bradfield & Aquino, 1999; Karremans & Van Lange, 2005; Okimoto et al., 2009).”