Challenges and Opportunities for Students Who Are Gifted: What the Experts Say
By S. Pfeiffer. 2003
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d4e6ec692e1893c1dd91fdda321d07e975aa312
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- K. Nandagopal
- K. Anders Ericsson
- Mary-Catherine Mcclain
- S. Isaksen
- S. Pfeiffer
- Jonathan Gaulin
- Roy W. Roring
- John M. Keller
Citations in the corpus
- Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: an account based on the expert performance framework (2007, background): “, a large amount of false negatives) are major concerns (Gagné, 1991; Feldhusen & Jarwan, 1993; Pfeiffer, 2003).”
- Identification of Gifted Students in the United States Today: A Look at State Definitions, Policies, and Practices (2012, background): “Authorities have advocated for a more comprehensive, conceptually sophisticated, and diagnostically defensible approach that includes multiple criteria (Borland, 2003; Pfeiffer, 2003; VanTassel-Baska, Feng, & Evans, 2007).”
- Handbook of Giftedness in Children: Psychoeducational Theory, Research, and Best Practices (2008, unknown): “First, the issues of definitions of giftedness or of gifted persons remain questions of central importance to the field (Pfeiffer, 2003).”
- A Reexamination of Brainstorming Research: Implications for Research and Practice (2005, background): “Creative learning and creative problem solving are well established programming areas for those who provide differentiated, as well as regular classroom instruction (Costa, 2001; McGrane & Sternberg, 1992; Pfeiffer, 2003).”
- Current Perspectives on the Identification and Assessment of Gifted Students (2012, background): “Most gifted authorities agree that academically gifted students are those in the upper 3% to 5% compared with their sameage peers in general intellectual ability, distinguished academic competence in one or more domains, and creativity (Pfeiffer, 2003, 2009).”