Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: an account based on the expert performance framework
By K. Anders Ericsson, Roy W. Roring, K. Nandagopal. 2007
271 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/272568c1eb71e56222417e4a94bc2825a5dafb0b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- K. Anders Ericsson
- K. Nandagopal
- Phillip L. Ackerman
- Dean Keith Simonton
- James C. Kaufman
- Giovanni Emanuele Corazza
- Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin
- Barry L. Bayus
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Nonsense, common sense, and science of expert performance: Talent and individual differences (2014, background): “Ericsson, Roring, and Nandagopal (2007) stated that “moreover Ericsson (2003) was unable to find any reproducible evidence that would limit the ability of motivated and healthy adults to achieve exceptional levels of memory performance given access to instruction and supportive training…”
- An expert performance approach to the study of individual differences in self-regulated learning activities in upper-level college students (2012, methodology): “Kitsantas, 2002 — 62 students; Zimmerman & Martinez-Pons, 1986, 1988 — 80 students). Indeed, power calculation based on our regression analysis using three significant predictors (seeking information, reviewing the textbook, and seeking assistance from peers) was comparable to those calculated from ”
- Scientific Talent, Training, and Performance: Intellect, Personality, and Genetic Endowment (2008, background): “In fact, Ericsson, Roring, and Nandagopal (2007) went so far as to question whether behavior genetics can ever establish the case for talent in any domain of high-level achievement.”