Science Is Golden: Academic R&D and University Patents

By T. Coupé. 2003

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d13d2003a159ba65c4e95600508c472ea2a6a48

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Advances in management research: a bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science (2020, background): “Bibliometric studies are available in a wide range of fields including economics (Coupe 2003), management (Podsakoff et al.”
Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity (2011, unknown): “As previous studies show, this experience could be expressed by time effects (COUPÉ, 2003; FRIEDMAN and SILBERMAN, 2003).”
Inside or Outside the IP-System? Business Creation in Academia (2010, background): “Scholars have examined all of the different parts of this process, from invention disclosures (Friedman and Silberman, 2003; Thursby and Thursby, 2005), patenting (Henderson et al., 1998; Hall et al., 2001; Mowery et al., 2002; Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002; Coupe, 2003; Sampat et al., 2003; Bercovitz a”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, unknown): “Both university-level and individual-level analyses show a predominantly positive relationship between faculty quality and involvement in patenting (Coupé, 2003; Geuna and Nesta, 2006; Stephan, 2007; Carayol, 2007; Van Looy et al., 2006; Breschi et al., 2007).”
Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany (2011, unknown): “As intermediaries, they lower the transaction costs between the demand and supply side of innovations by reducing the search and negotiation costs for both parties and often serve as a third party to protect the inventor’s interests against hold up problems (Hoppe and Ozdenoren 2001; Coupe 2003).”
Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, unknown): “Key findings Coupe (2003) A university with a TTO will have a higher expected number of patents than the university without a TTO, and the effect of the TTO increases over time.”
Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment (2008, background): “Several authors have found that RD Coupe 2001; Foltz et al. 2000; Foltz et al. 2001; Payne and Silow 2003).”
Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey (2010, background): “Owen-Smith and Powell (2001) Agrawal and Henderson (2002) Cohen et al. (2002) Feldman et al. (2002) Mowery et al. (2002) Mowery and Ziedonis (2002) Shane (2002) Thursby and Thursby (2002) Coupe (2003) Friedman and Silberman (2003) Hall et al. (2003) Nerkar and Shane (2003) Nicolaou and Birley (200”
ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY (2007, background): “Coupé (2003) found decreasing returns to scale at the university level of analysis.”
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “Some conflicting viewpoints that have been addressed in the line of university patenting studies revolve around patent quality (Wallmark, 1997; Henderson et al., 1998; Agarwal and Henderson, 2002; Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002; Mowery et al., 2002; Coupe, 2003; Sampat et al., 2003).”