Modeling and Testing Change: An Introduction to the Latent Growth Curve Model
By Barbara M. Byrne, G. Crombie. 2003
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cf35cfe2d0aa8e55b8bb82e95c66a07722ce6b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Kristopher J Preacher
- Noel A. Card
- T. Little
- D. Miščenko
- Hannes Guenter
- R. Haase
- A. Abele
- Daniel Spurk
Citations in the corpus
- How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time (2009, methodology): “We also tested for homoscedasticity and partial homoscedasticity of error variances in the three growth curves (cf. Byrne & Crombie, 2003; Shevlin & Millar, 2006).”
- Advanced Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research (2006, background): “…exists between baseline values and change over time; and (b) that LGC models allow researchers to easily model and test both potential covariates of change (e.g., gender) and different change trajectories (e.g., linear vs. quadratic change) in the same analysis (e.g., Byrne & Crombie, 2003).”
- Modeling Longitudinal Data from Research on Adolescence (2009, background): “Some of the more accessible ones include Byrne and Crombie ( 2003 ), Chan ( 1998 ), Curran ( 2000 ), Curran and Hussong ( 2003 ), Hancock and Lawrence ( 2006 ), and Willett and Sayer ( 1994 ).”
- Students' Silent Messages: Can Teacher Verbal and Nonverbal Immediacy Moderate Student Use of Text Messaging in Class? (2010, background): “To ensure satisfactory convergent validity, the manifested variables for each proposed latent construct should present factor loadings greater than .60; in contrast, the satisfactory discriminant validity should not exceed .40 (see Byrne, 2006; Byrne & Crombie, 2003).”
- Am I a Leader? Examining Leader Identity Development Over Time (2017, background): “Meaning refers to the definition of leadership held by an individual (Burke, 2006) whereas strength refers to the extent to which an individual identifies as a leader.”