Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment

By Colleen M. Kelley, Matthew G. Rhodes. 2002

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cc6f0c2c86bff1b6c3ae6ee7658df25f8414d0a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. John Dunlosky
2. Robert A. Bjork
3. Norbert Schwarz
4. E. G. Schellenberg
5. Nate Kornell
6. Carolyn Yoon
7. Sean H. K. Kang

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. E. G. Schellenberg
2. Robert A. Bjork
3. John Dunlosky
4. Carolyn Yoon
5. I. Skurnik
6. L. Sanna
7. Isabelle Peretz
8. S. Vieillard

In Social Psychology

1. Carolyn Yoon
2. Norbert Schwarz
3. E. G. Schellenberg
4. Robert A. Bjork
5. John Dunlosky
6. Bertram Gawronski
7. D. Oyserman
8. Joar Vittersø

Citations in the corpus

• Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. (2013, background): “(Fluency also influences a wide variety of other types of judgment; see Alter & Oppenheimer 2009, Kelley & Jacoby 1996, Kelley & Rhodes 2002, Oppenheimer 2008, Schwarz 2004.)”
• FLUENCY AND THE DETECTION OF MISLEADING QUESTIONS : LOW PROCESSING FLUENCY ATTENUATES THE MOSES ILLUSION (2008, unknown): “Earlier research indicated that fluently processed material seems more familiar (Kelley & Rhodes, 2002; Schwarz, 2004), is more likely to be accepted ), whereas disfluent processing reduces tABle 2. frequency of Answers in experiment 2”
• Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (2009, unknown): “, Kelley & Rhodes, 2002; Petty, Briñol, Tormala, & Wegener, 2007; Schwarz, 1998, 2004; Skurnik, Schwarz, & Winkielman, 2000; Winkielman, Schwarz, Fazendeiro, & Reber, 2003). Nonetheless, our definition of fluency encompasses a range of metacognitive phenomena that have not been identified as fluency”
• Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making (2004, background): “Hence, they rated the noise as louder when combined with new rather than old sentences (see also Goldinger, Kleider, & Shelley, 1999; and Kelley & Rhodes, 2002, for an extensive review).”
• Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns (2007, background): “…processing fluency that the information is familiar—even when the fluency derives from presentation variables, like good figure–ground contrast or long exposure times, or from contextual influences, like preceding semantic primes (for reviews see Kelley & Rhodes, 2002; Winkielman et al., 2003).”
• Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: Effects of exposure (2008, background): “Alternative accounts of processing fluency (e.g., Kelley & Rhodes, 2002;”