Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing

By D. Pecorari. 2006

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28880d30a877680c75c6fe5b7110b0c81ff73dba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Bojana Petrić
2. J. Flowerdew
3. Paul Thompson
4. Ken Hyland
5. Yongyan Li
6. Yuying Li
7. Hongwei Ren
8. Guangwei Hu

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Bojana Petrić
2. J. Flowerdew
3. Paul Thompson
4. Guangwei Hu
5. Yongyan Li
6. Ken Hyland
7. Jun Lei
8. D. Pecorari

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparison Study on the Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts in Published Research Articles and Master's Foreign-language Theses (2011, background): “Many of them either focus on certain rhetorical features (eg. Charles, 2003; Pecorari, 2006) or explore the rhetorical structures of certain sections, such as introductions (eg.”
• Beyond the accusation of plagiarism (2008, background): “…both the students and the tutors and the gap that exists " between what is prescribed and what is practiced " with respect to disciplinary norms and occluded academic genres (Pecorari, 2006: 4) will help avoid the tensions observed between the following student, Zhu, and her English tutor, Alan.”
• Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism (2015, background): “The literature suggests that different disciplines may have different norms for what constitutes plagiarism (Borg, 2009; Flowerdew & Li, 2007b; Jameson, 1993; Pecorari, 2006; Shi, 2010).”
• The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, background): “Thus, there is an overwhelming tendency in the natural sciences and technical fields to avoid quotation while it is a routine if minority form of reference in most of the social sciences and humanities (Hyland 2004a; Pecorari 2006).”
• Language Re-use among Chinese Apprentice Scientists Writing for Publication (2007, background): “As reported in Pecorari (2006) and as we learned in our research, the supervisors clearly considered the students’ language re-use (exemplified in this paper) as unacceptable.”
• Plagiarism in second-language writing (2014, methodology): “Pecorari (2006) showed that textual plagiarism was more common in the works of students in the STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering and mathematics), in other words, precisely those disciplines which do not ‘permit’ explicit, signalled quotation (in the sense that it is vanishingly…”