Beyond Formal Procedures: The Interpersonal Context of Procedural Justice
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Administration, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24f43c88e10cdc2b7ca86f4ac20d797dbf5f5597
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Public Administration
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Relationships between counterproductive work behavior, perceived justice and climate, occupational status, and leader-member exchange (2014, background): “…fair and respectful treatment, adequate and accurate information, resources and rewards are conceptualized as perceptions of organizational justice (see Ambrose & Schminke, 2009; Bell, Wiechmann, & Ryan, 2006; Chernyak-Hai & Tziner, 2012; Cropanzano, Prehar, & Chen, 2002; Tyler & Bies, 1990).”
- The mediating and moderating role of burnout and emotional intelligence in the relationship between organizational justice and work misbehavior (2017, unknown): “…accurate information, and resources and rewards are conceptualized as perceptions of organizational justice (see Ambrose & Schminke, 2009; Bell, Wiechmann, & Ryan, 2006; Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, 2001; Cropanzano, Prehar, & Chen, 2002; Tyler & Bies, 1990; Tziner & Chernyak-Hai, 2012).”
- Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “…justice perceptions inferred from interpersonal treatment includes both distributive (e.g., the quality of the treatment relevant to the available amount of socioemotional resources) and procedural (e.g., how and when the treatment is directed toward the employee) components (Tyler and Bies 1990).”
- Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect (2017, background): “Moreover, a person’s experiences of respect or disrespect in personal interactions with police officers play a central role in their judgments of how procedurally fair the police are as an institution, as well as their willingness to support or cooperate with the police (8, 9).”
- Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it (2013, background): “…when high levels of procedural justice exist (fair procedures, clearly communicated) Sensitive interpersonal treatment appears to help people cope better in situations that may elicit concerns about fairness, mitigating the negative repercussions that often stem from them (Tyler & Bies, 1990).”
- The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Ethical Voice: A Moderated Mediation Model of Felt Uncertainty and Leader Benevolence (2019, background): “In organizations, employees feel that it is a moral obligation for authority figures to show respect and explain their decisions in an interpersonally sensitive manner (Folger and Skarlicki 1999; Tyler and Bies 1990).”