On “Positive” and “Negative” Emotions
By R. Solomon, Lori D. Stone. 2002
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24bb6d1188e8f88b3e07d012889184847aeab66c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Seger M. Breugelmans
- M. Zeelenberg
- Rik Pieters
- Rob M. A. Nelissen
- Hanspeter Pfister
- P. Pihkala
- Anita R Howard
- David H. Barlow
In Social Psychology
- M. Zeelenberg
- Seger M. Breugelmans
- Rik Pieters
- Rob M. A. Nelissen
- Hongbiao Yin
- John Chi-Kin Lee
- Hanspeter Pfister
- P. Pihkala
Citations in the corpus
- Teachers’ emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective (2011, background): “However, this polarized dichotomy may be misleading and unhelpful in some cases because unpleasant emotions can play positive roles when they are judged by the social functions rather than the approach-avoidance appraisal ( Solomon and Stone 2002 ).”
- Feeling Is for Doing: A Pragmatic Approach to the Study of Emotions in Economic Behavior (2006, background): “What is more relevant here is that some emotions are bivalent—that is, they carry aspects of both positive and negative valence in them ( Solomon & Stone, 2002 ).”
- The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making (2008, background): “For others, however, we endorse the argument of Solomon and Stone (2002), that it is impossible to reduce the qualitatively complex and multidimensional appraisals to a simple valence dimension.”
- Understanding phenomenological differences in how affordances solicit action. An exploration (2018, background): “…recent criticism of such hedonicity: the dichotomy of positive and negative does not seem to capture the wide range of how things may be valenced (Solomon and Stone 2002; Lambie and Marcel 2002; Kristjánsson 2003; Charland 2005; Colombetti 2005).10 On some occasions, valence is discussed in the…”
- What is an emotional disorder? A transdiagnostic mechanistic definition with implications for assessment, treatment, and prevention (2019, background): “Inherent to the experience of any emotion is a valuation or appraisal of that emotion (Izard, 1971; Solomon & Stone, 2002; Tomkins, 1962, 1963).”
- Positive and negative emotional attractors and intentional change (2006, background): “These include the situational level of experience (assessment of a particular stimulus situation or event); the intrapersonal level (assessment of the situation's positive and/or negative impact on oneself); and the social system level (assessment of the situation's positive and/or negative impact o”
- On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing (2008, background): “Valence is a term borrowed from physics and chemistry (Solomon & Stone, 2002).”
- Eco-Anxiety and Environmental Education (2020, background): “The wording “so-called positive / negative emotions” is used here because there are often serious problems in labeling the so-called negative emotions as undesired and “bad” [167], even though numerous psychologists and other writers have emphasized that they also belong to normal life [57,123,144].”