Student Engagement in Campus-Based and Online Education: University Connections

By H. Coates. 2006

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24a51888b120198880d772ae6920815220f4197e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Student Engagement Predictions in an e-Learning System and Their Impact on Student Course Assessment Scores (2018, background): “Student engagement is the effort that a student spends on learning processes for the content of a specific course [14].”
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS OF PARTIDO STATE UNIVERSITY (2019, background): “4 activities is important, as it helps manage the quality and productivity of university education (Coates, 2006).”
Students’ engagement in first‐year university (2008, positive): “Together, NSSE (2005a) and Coates (2006) identify key collaborative activities as central to student engagement.”
Online Learning Readiness Among University Students in Malaysia Amidst Covid-19 (2020, background): “Over the years, much interest revolves around online learning readiness among university students (eg; Atkinson & Blenakenship, 2009, Coates, 2006; Chung et al, 2020; Hung, Chou, Chen & Own, 2010; McVay, 2000).”
Student engagement literature review (2010, background): “1991, 1997; Kuh 2004, 2008a; Pascarella & Terenzini 1991, 2005; Ewell & Jones 1996; Pace 1995; Tinto 1993; Coates 2006) .”
Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework (2019, methodology): “Coates (2007) applied the Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) to online as well as more “general campus-based engagement” (p.”
Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE) (2010, background): “1995, 2001), in development of the USA National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) (Kuh 2001, 2009), and in scholarly investigation of the phenomenon of student engagement itself (Coates 2006; Pascarella and Terenzini 1991, 2005).”
Student engagement evidence summary (2010, background): “2 .1 .2 Specific features of engagement improve outcomes Specific aspects of engagement, such as involvement, time on task, and quality of effort, have repeatedly been linked to positive outcomes (see Astin, 1984, 1999; Braxton, Milem and Sullivan, 2000; Goodsell, Maher and Tinto, 1992; Feldman and ”
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review (2015, background): “The literature tells us that one of the primary components of effective teaching is student engagement and that engagement is critical for learning (Barkley, 2010; Coates, 2006).”
Facebook in higher education promotes social but not academic engagement (2011, background): “In the context of more students entering the tertiary sector thus creating a more diverse student body (Dobson, 2010), less funding is available for student clubs and societies (NUS, 2011), and more students are combining work and study (Pike, Kuh & McKinley, 2008; Polidano & Zakirova, 2011), there ”
A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement (2007, methodology): “The Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ) (Coates, 2006) was used to survey students.”
An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education (2018, background): “As Coates (2006) highlighted, “institutions are responsible for creating environments that make learning possible, that afford opportunities to learn,” but “the final responsibility for learning … rests with students” (p. 29).”