The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform
By N. Gallini. 2002
684 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/244c60fd0ff381d84510e790d1ed5c9dcedb26ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Giovanni Dosi
- Alfonso Gambardella
- Christoph Grimpe
- Curba Morris Lampert
- Vivek Tandon
- Gautam Ahuja
- Megan J. MacGarvie
- D. Lueck
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Alfonso Gambardella
- Gautam Ahuja
- D. Lueck
- Alessandra Luzzi
- Vivek Tandon
- Guido Cozzi
- A. Chu
- Elisabeth Müller
Citations in the corpus
- How open is innovation (2010, background): “Gallini (2002) predicted that stronger IPR promote greater willingness to license as protection for ideas allow organizations to respond to opportunistic behaviour with legal sanctions.”
- Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility (2009, neutral): “patent owners (Jaffe, 2000; Gallini, 2002) and intensified efforts by firms to capture value from innovation-related investments (Somaya, 2003).”
- R&D and the Patent Premium (2008, neutral): “Also, the effect of “stronger” patents on incentives to innovate are also not apparent once one recognizes that “stronger” patents mean that not only any given firm's patents but also those of its rivals are stronger (cf. Jaffe, 2000; Gallini, 2002).”
- Patent Systems for Encouraging Innovation: Lessons from Economic Analysis (2006, neutral): “2 See e.g. Kortum and Lerner (1999), Jaffe (2000), Coriat and Orsi (2002), Gallini (2002), Martinez and Guellec (2004).”
- The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions (2011, methodology): “…Court for properties under both MB within the VMD and RS for the rest of Ohio.39 We divide the cases into three categories, although they often overlap: boundary disputes, validity of entry/patent disputes, 38 This practice is similar to the use of so-called submarine patents (Gallini 2002, 147).”
- Appropriability mechanisms, innovation, and productivity: evidence from the UK (2014, neutral): “…it has to do so in such a way that the social costs associated with the creation of a (possibly short-term) legal monopoly are minimised while not hindering the diffusion of the newly created knowledge across the economic system (Levin et al. 1987; Gallini 2002; Kultti, Takalo, and Toikka 2007).”
- How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?: On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation (2006, background): “In discrete product industries, patents are used to block substitutes by creating patent " fences " (cf. Gallini (2002), Ziedonis (2004)).”
- Patent Pools and Cross-Licensing in the Shadow of Patent Litigation (2010, neutral): “…view of the recent explosion of patent awards triggered by U.S. patent reform in the last two decades and escalating litigation costs.33 This development has led some commentators to even question whether the proliferation of patent awards may impede rather than promote innovation (Gallini, 2002).”
- Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms (2004, neutral): “Jaffe (2000) and Gallini (2001) provide more nuanced”