How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?: On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation
By Giovanni Dosi, Luigi Marengo, Corrado Pasquali. 2006
391 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a908d2b15634523703e654b19258bcab617bb32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Giovanni Dosi
- Richard R. Nelson
- Carliss Y. Baldwin
- Fulvio Castellacci
- Eric von Hippel
- Joseph E. Stiglitz
- Christine Greenhalgh
- Sharon D. James
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Giovanni Dosi
- Fulvio Castellacci
- Eric von Hippel
- Richard R. Nelson
- Carliss Y. Baldwin
- Christine Greenhalgh
- Sharon D. James
- M. Rogers
In Strategy and Management
- Carliss Y. Baldwin
- Eric von Hippel
- Richard R. Nelson
- Fulvio Castellacci
- Giovanni Dosi
- Joseph E. Stiglitz
- Christine Greenhalgh
- Sharon D. James
Citations in the corpus
- The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation: the Past and Future of Policies for Industrial Development. A Preface (2008, background): “It happens that quite often appropriability conditions depend to a large extent on the nature of technological and production knowledge itself (cf. Dosi, Marengo, and Pasquali, 2006, and the literature cited therein).”
- Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth (2007, background): “The variable refers mainly to patenting as the mean of appropriating the benefits of innovative activity, while it neglects other informal means, such as, for instance, process secrecy and know-how, and design and R&D know-how (Pavitt, 1984; Dosi et al., 2006).”
- Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation (2010, background): “When taken together, the findings of these empirical studies make it very clear that users have long been doing and continue to do a lot of commercially significant product and process development and modification in many fields.”
- Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes (2009, background): “(More in Mazzoleni and Nelson, 1998; Jaffe, 2000; Granstrand, 1999; Dosi, Marengo, and Pasquali, 2006; and the growing literature cited therein).”
- The value of intellectual property rights to firms and society (2007, background): “Dosi et al. (2006) cite a considerable range of examples of new technologies forming the core of the ICT revolution that evolved rapidly with no patent regime, or a very weak one, including semiconductors, computer software, and mobile telephones (until the late 1980s).”
- How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations (2013, background): “For instance, Dosi, Marengo, and Pasquali (2006) argued that appropriability conditions are largely dictated by the nature of technological knowledge.”
- Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation (2008, background): “…innovative activities and industrial dynamics in different sectors, particularly in terms of technological opportunities, properties of the knowledge base, cumulativeness and appropriability conditions (e.g. Marsili and Verspagen, 2002; Malerba, 2002; Van de Poel, 2003; Dosi et al., 2006).”