R&D and the Patent Premium
By Ashish Arora, Marco Ceccagnoli, Wesley M. Cohen. 2008
437 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bc230f5c2f34d35c1b589d708ef22e68d4b473e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Carolin Haeussler
- Elisabeth F. Mueller
- Scott Stern
- Marco Ceccagnoli
- Dietmar Harhoff
- David H. Hsu
- Joshua S. Gans
- Bronwyn H Hall
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David H. Hsu
- Marco Ceccagnoli
- Elisabeth F. Mueller
- Carolin Haeussler
- Dietmar Harhoff
- Scott Stern
- Ashish Arora
- Joshua S. Gans
Citations in the corpus
- Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries (2006, neutral): “…example, Robson et al. (1988) and Geroski et al. (1997) for analyses based on the SPRU innovation data, Levin et al. (1987) and Cockburn and Griliches (1988) for analyses based on the Yale survey data, and Cohen et al. (2000) and Arora et al. (2003) for analyses based on the Carnegie-Mellon survey.”
- Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (2016, neutral): “42 Hall and Ziedonis (2001); Arora, Ceccagnoli, and Cohen (2008); Gurmu and Pérez-Sebastián (2008); Dernis et al. (2015).”
- Does Foreign Environmental Policy Influence Domestic Innovation? Evidence from the Wind Industry (2014, positive): “This value is in line with previous studies measuring the average R&D expenditures associated with patented innovation30 (see Arora et al., 2008).”
- Patent Value and Citations: Creative Destruction or Strategic Disruption? (2013, neutral): “Arora, Ceccagnoli, and Cohen (2008) show conditions under which firm’s with equivalent R&D efforts patent differently; Bloom, Schankerman, and Van Reenen (2013) model negative and positive technology spillovers based on a firms position in technology and product market spaces.”
- Patent Laws, Product Life-Cycle Lengths, and Multinational Activity (2014, neutral): “National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Annual 8: 157–176.”
- Appropriability, Preemption, and Firm Performance (2009, positive): “Indeed, the patenting choice depends on the net benefits from patenting, which are in turn empirically captured by the measure of patent effectiveness (Arora, Ceccagnoli, and Cohen, 2008; Arora and Ceccagnoli, 2006).”
- Patent Rights and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Panels of Manufacturing Industries (2013, neutral): “Indeed, Arora et al. (2008) concluded: ‘studies analyzing the impact of IPRs [IP rights] on innovation and growth have yielded mixed and, at times, difficult-to-interpret results’.”
- Patents and patent policy (2007, neutral): “Using a structural model that combines survey responses with accounting data on RD Arora et al 2003; Arora and Merges 2004).”
- The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis (2021, positive): “suggested by Arora et al. (2008). The empirical studies that examine the effect of IPRs protection on innovation and growth usually point to an overall positive effect.”
- Does patenting help high-tech start-ups? (2011, neutral): “For reference, the 95% condence interval for the 0.147 coecient on regression ( 1 ) is between 0.09 and 0.20.”
- Patent Protection, Market Uncertainty, and R&D Investment (2006, neutral): “Arora et al. (2007) discuss this issue and Cohen (2005) surveys the arguments and evidence on appropriation.”
- The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays (2008, positive): “Patents vary widely in their value, which depends on endogenous outcomes in technology and product markets (Scherer and Harhoff 2000, Arora et al. 2008, Giuri et al. 2007).”
- The role of patent protection in (clean/green) technology transfer (2010, positive): “Fourth and finally, the existence and strength of the patent system affects the organization of industry by allowing trade in knowledge, which facilitates the vertical disintegration of knowledge‐ based industries and the entry of new firms that possess only intangible assets (Hall and Ziedonis, 200”