Employment of People with Disabilities Following the ADA

By Douglas L. Kruse, Lisa Schur. 2003

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2438d44cb793bc7933dd6927fface9401a668965

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Pamela R. Waltz
2. Alecia M. Santuzzi
3. Melanie K. Jones
4. W. Stock
5. Kathleen G. Beegle
6. David C. Baldridge
7. A. Janus
8. Mukta Kulkarni

In Safety Research

1. Alecia M. Santuzzi
2. Pamela R. Waltz
3. Melanie K. Jones
4. W. Stock
5. Kathleen G. Beegle
6. A. Janus
7. Mukta Kulkarni
8. Paul Latreille

Citations in the corpus

• Barriers or Opportunities? The Causes of Contingent and Part‐Time Work Among People with Disabilities (2003, background): “Kruse and Schur (2003), however, find that employment increased when using alternative measures of disability.”
• The Disability Employment Puzzle: A Field Experiment on Employer Hiring Behavior (2018, unknown): “Later studies found no decline when other measures and techniques were used (Beegle and Stock 2003; Hotchkiss 2003, 2004; Kruse and Schur 2003; Houtenville and Burkhauser 2004; Donahue, Stein, Griffin, and Becker 2011), and that any ADA-related decline in employment was temporary (Jolls and…”
• On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda (2018, background): “For example, Lengnick-Hall, Gaunt, and Kulkarni (2008) interviewed US corporate executives in a study that aimed to explain why employers do not hire persons with disabilities.”
• Disability and the Transition to Adulthood (2009, background): “Indeed, several studies have noted progress in areas such as disabled people’s employment, physical access to transportation and the availability of assistive technology (Carpenter 2006; Hotchkiss 2004; Jackson, Blanck and Schmeling 2007; Kruse and Schur 2003).”
• Disability and the labour market: a review of the empirical evidence (2008, background): “1998, Acemoglu and Angrist, 2001 and Kruse and Schur, 2003 and for the UK see”
• Disability in the Workplace (2016, background): “The lack of a consistent definition for disability leads to challenges in interpreting the estimates of relative representation of workers with disabilities across time points and across different organizations (Barnow, 2008; Kruse & Schur, 2003).”
• The Labor Market Effects of Disability Discrimination Laws (2003, methodology): “Alternatively, Kruse and Schur (2002) nd mixed evidence regarding the employment trends among the disabled in the years after the ADA, depending on how disability was measured.”
• Disability, gender, and the British labour market (2006, background): “Kruse D. and Schur, L. (2003) ‘Employment of people with disabilities following the ADA’, Industrial Relations, 42, 31-64.”