How to Improve Your School: giving pupils a voice

By H. Johnson. 2004

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers (2005, background): “The pupil commentaries, along with the findings from other studies both within and prior to the TLRP Consulting Pupils Network (see Rudduck & Flutter, 2004) were at the same time reassuring and worrying.”
Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: what can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning (2014, background): “A second wave of student voice work arose in the early 2000s (Cook-Sather, 2002; Fielding, 2001; Pekrul & Levin, 2005; Rudduck & Flutter, 2004), and since then analyses of and guidelines for how to pursue such work have proliferated (Cook-Sather, 2009b; Fielding, 2006; MacBeath, Demetriou, Rudduck,…”
Teacher–Student Relationship Quality and Student Engagement: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study (2020, background): “Listening to and consulting students should be a vital component of school improvement (Fisher 2014; Morgan 2011; Rudduck and Flutter 2004), and more research on how they understand, experience and perceive teachers and relationships with teachers is therefore needed.”