Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities
By Melissa A. Schilling. 2002
639 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2257f5b786383c0d6e43ceec0c9c2325d4295850
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Joost Rietveld
- Melissa A. Schilling
- Geerten van de Kaa
- L. Kamp
- Rahul Kapoor
- Chieh-Peng Lin
- Anol Bhattacherjee
- Gianvito Lanzolla
In Strategy and Management
- Joost Rietveld
- Melissa A. Schilling
- Rahul Kapoor
- Chieh-Peng Lin
- Anol Bhattacherjee
- Geoffrey G. Parker
- Gianvito Lanzolla
- Fernando F. Suarez
Citations in the corpus
- Perspectives on Innovation Processes (2013, background): “we mean a path dependent sequence of events (Arthur, 1989; David, 1985), initiated by chance events and subsequent developments driven by positive feedback loops, that locks the system into progressions along specific directions (Schilling, 2002).”
- The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory (2007, positive): “knowledge obsolete, destroy existing competences (Henderson & Clark, 1990; Leonard Barton, 1992; Schilling, 2002; Tushman & Anderson, 1986), and negate possible “experience curve” advantages (Lieberman, 1989).”
- Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment's strategic importance (2012, background): “Actual R&D expenditures were not used as a surrogate for internal capability because not all internal capability is accumulated through explicitly acknowledged R&D projects (Schilling, 2002).”
- Elucidating Individual Intention to Use Interactive Information Technologies: The Role of Network Externalities (2008, methodology): “” Finally, the referent network size construct was constructed using a modifi ed version of Schilling’s four-item scale that included such items as “What percentage of your friends uses IM” and “What percentage of your peers (in work or school) uses IM” [36].”
- Selection of biomass thermochemical conversion technology in the Netherlands: A best worst method approach (2017, background): “More specifically, we contribute to the literature by providing further evidence that the process of technology selection can be assessed (Schilling, 2002; Suarez, 2004).”
- Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age (2018, background): “In addition, velocity in the early stages of a technology’s life is fundamental for its future path (Schilling 2002).”
- The Uncertainty of Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2011, background): “…demonstrate how complex systems provide an overall conceptual framework for thinking about innovation Complex systems thinking Multiple case study 2 Schilling (2002) To model the technology selection process Learning; timing; network externalities Multiple case study; survey 7 Schlich…”
- Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments (2013, background): “In so doing, it adds to the small but emerging empirical literature that has considered the role of complementors in shaping firm strategies and performance outcomes (e.g., Adner and Kapoor, 2010; McIntyre and Subramaniam, 2009, Schilling, 2002; Venkatraman and Lee, 2004).”
- How Firms Capture Value From Their Innovations (2013, methodology): “Comparative approaches are used widely in political economy (Schilling, 2002), sociology (Lang & Lundholm, 1996), and organizational economics (Williamson, 1991).”
- An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives (2016, background): “Moreover, Schilling (2002) indicated that a technology user's perceived benefit may increase with the number of users of the same technology when compatibility is important.”
- Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms (2015, background): “If the ibusiness has better technology or a strong brand, it might be able to attract current users from the existing platform provider, especially if user requirements change (Eisenmann, Parker, & van Alstyne, 2006; Schilling, 2002).”