Talent management and organisational justice: employee reactions to high potential identification
By Jolyn Gelens, Joeri Hofmans, Nicky Dries, Roland Pepermans. 2014
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21716e49d969d72b19264572feb612a1ff1f91fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Eva Gallardo-Gallardo
- Maria Christina Meyers
- M. Thunnissen
- G. D. Boeck
- M. Morley
- Roberto Luna Arocas
- Nicky Dries
Citations in the corpus
- Standing on the shoulders of giants? A critical review of empirical talent management research (2016, background): “The rest of the articles (37%), mostly quantitative studies, are based on testing research (e.g., Gelens et al., 2014).”
- Talent management, talent mindset competency and job performance: the mediating role of job satisfaction (2015, methodology): “Although this is quite useful for building a model in TM, as was expressed by Lewis and Heckman (2006), other variables related to involvement/ commitment and satisfaction are also important in explaining the effectiveness and impact of a TM strategy (Gelens et al., 2014).”
- Employee reactions to talent management: Assumptions versus evidence (2018, background): “In their empirical study, Gelens et al. (2014) found that procedural justice acted”