Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-011.
By K. J. Roth, Stephen L. Druker, Helen Garnier, Meike Lemmens, Catherine Chen, Takako Kawanaka, D. Rasmussen, Svetlana Trubacova, Dagmar Warvi, Y. Okamoto and 2 more. 2006
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/213afce969932ef8dec805281c42f8c2a1c86e31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Miray Tekkumru‐Kisa
- Mary Kay Stein
- Christian D. Schunn
- Miray Tekkumru Kisa
- Melissa D. Boston
- Yong Wu
- Melissa Patchan
- Young Hoan Cho
Citations in the corpus
- A Framework for Analyzing Cognitive Demand and Content-Practices Integration: Task Analysis Guide in Science (2015, background): “…case in many classrooms: Students are asked to simply verify knowledge, follow procedures, or carry out activities with weak or no conceptual links (Roth et al., 2006); teachers generally use low level ‘‘fill in the blank’’ questions with a focus on getting the right answer rather than helping…”
- Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science (2015, unknown): “Despite debates about enriching teaching through diverse didactical methods, classroom discourse and verbal teacherestudent interactions remain dominant in mathematics and science education (Roth et al., 2006).”
- Learning to See Teaching in New Ways (2015, background): “Similarly, although there was a significant focus in U.S. science classrooms on inquiry activities (e.g., creating models, conducting experiments, observing phenomena), such activities were used for verifying knowledge or following a procedure (Roth et al., 2006; Roth & Garnier, 2006).”
- Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy (2010, unknown): “Science instruction attempts to replicate the science process using cookbook-style labs that serve as verification of ideas rather than construction and critique of ideas (Roth et al., 2006; Weiss, Banilower, McMahon, & Smith, 2001).”