Seeing what they meant: transcribing as a route to noticing

By T. Lynch. 2001

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2075d3070247b1b73d79cb705fef895faed5312c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. P. Skehan
2. Li Qian
3. Zhan Wang
4. Gavin Bui
5. T. Lynch
6. A. Pinter
7. S. M. Ismail
8. Keivan Seyyedi

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Li Qian
2. Zhan Wang
3. Gavin Bui
4. P. Skehan
5. T. Lynch
6. Andrea Révész
7. Peter Robinson
8. Judit Kormos

Citations in the corpus

• The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance (2012, methodology): “…in a subsequent study, Foster and Skehan (2011) used a different post-task condition, the need to transcribe some of one’s own task performance (Lynch, 2001, 2007), and showed significant effects for accuracy in the earlier task performance for both a narrative and a decision making task, and…”
• Learning from the transcripts of an oral communication task (2007, background): “Johnson 1996). Three advantages of learners’ transcribing and editing their own spoken English, noted in my earlier article ( Lynch 2001 ), were: the cooperative interaction between the learners; the trouble taken over fine detail in their output; and the opportunity for the renegotiation of meaning”