Listening Comprehension and Strategy Use: A Longitudinal Exploration.

By S. Graham, Denise Santos, R. Vanderplank. 2008

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2034201558e0528770fbb81e2b31d9c560c6ccf0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Graham
2. Guangwei Hu
3. Christine Goh
4. Denise Santos
5. R. Vanderplank
6. E. Macaro
7. Larry Vandergrift
8. Meral Şeker

In Language and Linguistics

1. S. Graham
2. Guangwei Hu
3. Christine Goh
4. E. Macaro
5. Denise Santos
6. R. Vanderplank
7. Larry Vandergrift
8. Y. Lo

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. S. Graham
2. Guangwei Hu
3. E. Macaro
4. Christine Goh
5. Denise Santos
6. R. Vanderplank
7. Larry Vandergrift
8. Y. Lo

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data (2014, background): “Graham, Santos, and Vanderplank (2008) also found that weak listeners were misled by words they had predicted before a listening activity and did not evaluate their comprehension using their contextual knowledge.”
• Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use (2011, methodology): “As commented in Graham et al. (2008), at both times hypothesis formation went hand in hand with deduction based on negative evidence, i.e. the hypotheses were based on her not hearing certain words, or not knowing certain items of vocabulary.”
• Strategy Instruction in Listening for Lower‐Intermediate Learners of French (2008, background): “For a fuller account of phase 1, see Graham, Santos, and Vanderplank (2008).”