Organizational Justice: Where Do We Stand?

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Customer (In)Justice and Emotional Labor: The Role of Perspective Taking, Anger, and Emotional Regulation† (2008, background): “, the supervisor) should be kept separate (Colquitt, 2001; Colquitt et al., 2001; Colquitt et al., 2005).”
Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: : integrating self-determination and social exchange theories (2014, methodology): “Consequently, SET has been used to account for the outcomes of justice (Colquitt et al., 2005; Cropanzano and Mitchell, 2005; Walumbwa et al., 2009).”
PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE, AND TASK PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION (2009, background): “Still other mediators may be found outside of the motivational realm altogether (Colquitt et al., 2005).”
Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments (2011, background): “As described above, individuals pay attention to fairness information and make judgments for a reason—what has more recently been referred to as a justice concern (Colquitt et al., 2005).”