Randomized interdependent group contingencies: Group reinforcement with a twist

By Kimberly Kelshaw-Levering, Heather E. Sterling-Turner, J. R. Henry, Christopher H. Skinner. 2000

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fbb2ae052066b78ffba39d6b9e3af3e343a2448

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Thomas J. Kehle

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Truus Harms
2. H. de Boer
3. M. V. van Kuijk
4. S. Doolaard
5. H. Korpershoek

In Social Psychology

1. Truus Harms
2. H. de Boer
3. M. V. van Kuijk
4. S. Doolaard
5. H. Korpershoek
6. Thomas J. Kehle

Citations in the corpus

• Contemporary Review of Group-Oriented Contingencies for Disruptive Behavior (2004, background): “However, it is a formidable task for teachers to act as gatekeepers, granting access to activities for some students while others are not included (Kelshaw et al., 2000).”
• A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Classroom Management Strategies and Classroom Management Programs on Students’ Academic, Behavioral, Emotional, and Motivational Outcomes (2016, background): “These group contingencies can be classified into three types as discussed in Kelshaw-Levering, Sterling-Turner, and Henry (2000): independent, interdependent, and dependent group contingencies.”