Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?

By Luis L. Maridns, Lucy L. Gilson, M. Maynard. 2004

1,394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management of Technology and Innovation, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ed5e8d8cd5e9051855651093eb01fb605b77bb1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration (2020, neutral): “online team) [13], synchronicity (synchronous vs.”
The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality (2005, background): “Others have recently argued that the distinction between purely virtual teams and co-located teams is unrealistic and artificial and that all teams can be described in terms of their virtuality (Cohen & Gibson, 2003; Griffith & Neale, 2001; Griffith et al., 2003; Martins et al., 2004).”
Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design (2008, background): “, the degree to which individuals are collocated and/or utilize technology for mediating their communication; Kirkman & Mathieu, 2005; Martins, Gilson, & Maynard, 2004) has been shown to affect a range of worker outcomes (see Bailey & Kurland, 2002; Martins et al., 2004).”
The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams (2006, background): “Antecedents to OSS Team Output Effectiveness Input-process-outcome models of team work (Ilgen et al. 2005; Martins et al. 2004) imply that OSS team output effectiveness is likely to be influenced by the effectiveness of the team in attracting and retaining input.”
Global organizational communities of practice: The effects of nationality diversity, psychological safety, and media richness on community performance (2013, background): “…that the OCoP literature has yet to address nationality diversity effects, we turned to virtual teams literature reviews (Hertel et al., 2005; Kirkman et al., 2012; Martins et al., 2004) for guidance, finding only two studies examining nationality diversity effects in global virtual collaboration.”
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, background): “Beyond the many directions for future VT research outlined by Martins et al. (2004), the team virtuality area is ripe for further development.”
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness (2012, background): “Traditionally, researchers assumed that team functioning suffered when members relied extensively on technology (Martins et al., 2004; Warkentin, Sayeed, & Hightower, 1997).”