The affective bases for the gendering of traits: Comparing the United States and Canada.

By T. Langford, N. MacKinnon. 2000

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e051b00a50547ef7a16adb99fbfd3560264e6db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. John T. Jost
2. Aaron C. Kay
3. H. Thórisdóttir
4. Jaime L. Napier
5. A. Eagly
6. T. Beauregard
7. Steven J. Karau
8. Chieh-Peng Lin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. H. Thórisdóttir
3. Aaron C. Kay
4. Jaime L. Napier
5. A. Eagly
6. Janet K. Swim
7. S. Shields
8. Matthew J. Zawadzki

Citations in the corpus

• Women “Take Care,” Men “Take Charge”: Managers' Stereotypic Perceptions of Women and Men Leaders (2009, background): “We expected that male and female respondents would be equally likely to endorse the content of masculine and feminine trait stereotypes (Eagly & Mladinic, 1994; Langford & MacKinnon, 2000).”
• Clarifying the Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Gender, and Knowledge Sharing in Workplace Organizations in Taiwan (2008, background): “F om an interpersonal perspective, women are generally stereotyped as warm, sociable, interdependent, and relationship oriented (Langford and MacKinnon 2000).”
• Perfectionism, self-efficacy and OCB: the moderating role of gender (2012, background): “achievement-oriented (Langford and MacKinnon, 2000).”
• Reducing the Endorsement of Sexism Using Experiential Learning (2014, background): “For instance, many of the positive stereotypes of women (e.g., warm, gentle, empathic) are at odds with perceptions of competence (Eagly & Mladinic, 1989; Glick & Fiske, 2001; Langford & MacKinnon, 2000).”
• The Joy of Sexism? A Multinational Investigation of Hostile and Benevolent Justifications for Gender Inequality and Their Relations to Subjective Well-Being (2010, background): “Everybody I knew was not oppressed and was very happy and was not miserable, and we were all enjoying raising our families.”
• Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. (2005, background): “The positive valence of many female stereotypes may be ingratiating on one level (Eagly & Mladinic, 1993; Kilianski & Rudman, 1998; Langford & MacKinnon, 2000) and contribute to women's subjugation on another (Glick & Fiske, 2001; Jost & Banaji, 1994).”
• The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. (2009, background): “…superior social status is conveyed by the agentic attributes ascribed to men, such as being dominant and masterful (Ridgeway & Bourg, 2004), even though these attributes are not as favorably evaluated as the communal attributes ascribed to women (Eagly & Mladinic, 1994; Langford & MacKinnon, 2000).”
• Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002, background): “…on evaluations of women and men as social groups challenges this approach with evidence that women are not regarded as less good than men, even though they are perceived as inferior to men in power and status (see Eagly & Mladinic, 1994; Langford & MacKinnon, 2000; J. E. Williams & Best, 1990a).”