The Joy of Sexism? A Multinational Investigation of Hostile and Benevolent Justifications for Gender Inequality and Their Relations to Subjective Well-Being

By Jaime L. Napier, H. Thórisdóttir, John T. Jost. 2010

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ece96a4049c3ed86a1ff7e62ae5df0c0733d908d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. D. Schmitt

In Social Psychology

1. D. Schmitt
2. Mark Schaller
3. Damian R. Murray
4. Steve Stewart-Williams
5. Gregory D. Webster
6. Peter B. Smith
7. J. Tooby
8. L. Cosmides

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Schmitt
2. Mark Schaller
3. David M. Buss
4. Damian R. Murray
5. Steve Stewart-Williams
6. Gregory D. Webster
7. Peter B. Smith
8. J. Tooby

Citations in the corpus

• The Evolution of Culturally-Variable Sex Differences: Men and Women Are Not Always Different, but When They Are…It Appears Not to Result from Patriarchy or Sex Role Socialization (2015, background): “Examples of this form of national gender equity include attitudes toward gender equality from nationally-representative attitude surveys (Inglehart and Norris 2003), surveys of hostile and benevolent sexism (Napier et al. 2010), and surveys of sex role ideology (SRI; Schmitt et al.”
• Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. (2011, unknown): “…(Glick & Fiske, 1996, 2001a, 2001b) and complementary (see Jost & Kay, 2005; Kay et al., 2007) or compensatory (see Kay, Czaplin´ski, & Jost, 2009; Kervyn, Yzerbyt, Judd, & Nunes, 2009; Napier, Thorisdottir, & Jost, 2010) stereotypes are especially well suited to justify gender inequalities.”