When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards

By Aparna Joshi, Jooyeon Son, Hyuntak Roh. 2014

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties (2016, background): “In a separate meta-analysis that spanned an array of industries and occupations and included 142 studies across a 30-year time period, Joshi, Son, and Roh (2015) showed that gender differences favoring men over women in salaries, bonus, and promotions were substantially larger than were gender…”
Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method (2017, background): “…international business strategies (8) global stakeholder orientation (9) corporate social responsibility (10) international competitive advantages Joshi et al. (2015), Henik (2015), Ho and Lu (2015), Huarng (2015), Iseke et al. (2015), Leischnig and Kasper-Brauer (2015), Ni et al. (2015), Tho…”
Gender Stereotypes. (2018, background): “That this reflects a broader tendency to undervalue the professional performance of women is clearly visible in a meta-analysis of almost 100 empirical studies conducted among 378,850 employees in different industries ( Joshi et al. 2015).”