Determinants of Innovative Activity in Japanese Technology-based Start-up Firms
By M. Lynskey. 2004
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d6ebf60423cff2aeddb9553e4e54933db227905
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- P. Ganotakis
- J. Love
- Elena Sousa‐Ginel
- J. Ruiz-Navarro
- C. Camelo‐Ordaz
- Sophie Anna De Winne
- Harald Strotmann
- Andreas Koch
In Economics and Econometrics
- P. Ganotakis
- J. Love
- J. Ruiz-Navarro
- C. Camelo‐Ordaz
- Nicholas S. Vonortas
- Sophie Anna De Winne
- Harald Strotmann
- Yannis Caloghirou
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- J. Ruiz-Navarro
- C. Camelo‐Ordaz
- J. Love
- Nicholas S. Vonortas
- Sophie Anna De Winne
- Harald Strotmann
- Yannis Caloghirou
- Andreas Koch
Citations in the corpus
- Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement (2014, unknown): “…et al. (2008) discover a relationship between the founding team members’ background and new ventures’ propensity to seek and pursue entrepreneurial opportunities, Lynskey (2004) on the contrary does not find any link between the CEO’s human capital and new product development in new ventures.”
- Founders’ human capital and the performance of UK new technology based firms (2012, background): “Lynskey (2004) further argued that although it can be expected that entrepreneurs with degrees will outperform those without, entrepreneurs with PhDs might not perform as well.”
- Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe (2017, background): “More specifically, knowledge emanating from universities can be very important to innovative firms, especially those that have not accumulated enough R &D assets through their own in-house efforts, such as newly-established companies (Lynskey, 2004).”
- The intrapreneur and innovation in creative firms (2012, background): “…determine their orientation toward innovation are organizational tenure, functional background, educational level and age (Bantel and Jackson, 1989; Barkema and Chvyrkov, 2007; Daellenbach et al., 1999; Kor, 2006; Krishnan et al., 2006; Lynskey, 2004; Lyon and Ferrier, 2002; Rapp and Hao 2008).”
- R&D, product innovation, and exporting: evidence from UK new technology based firms (2011, background): “NTBFs are firms that operate mainly in highly innovative (high-tech) sectors, and tend to be high-growth firms for which overseas markets play an important role (Acs and Audretsch, 1987; Lynskey, 2004).”
- ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION IN THE KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICE SECTOR (2008, background): “…that innovation is not confined to technical processes and products, most contemporary research on innovative activity still focuses on technical innovation and on the manufacturing sector (e.g. Becker and Dietz, 2004; Huergo and Jaumandreu, 2004; Lynskey, 2004; Nieto and Santamaria, 2005).”
- Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy (2010, methodology): “Prior research has provided evidence of this relationship in start-ups (Lynskey 2004 ).”
- Export propensity, export intensity and firm performance: The role of the entrepreneurial founding team (2012, background): “…development of those innovative products/services requires a large and continuous R&D investment to be made by ETBFs immediately from their inception, which means that entering large enough markets that can allow them to offset high R&D expenditure is vital (Lynskey, 2004; Acs and Audretsch, 1987).”