Lexical Activation in Bilinguals' Speech Production: Language-Specific or Language-Independent?

By À. Colomé. 2001

407 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1aaa8c23e98f899c1c861d2ae584c0b0e3bbe61d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Executive Control in Bilingual Language Processing (2006, background): “Syntactic interference is expected in bilinguals, given that lemma activation is produced in all languages in bilinguals at least to some degree (Colomé, 2001; Hermans et al., 1998; Rodriguez-Fornells et al., 2005).”
Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production (2011, methodology): “The paradigm used by Colomé and Miozzo (2010) offers a way to disentangle those different accounts of cognate effects. If their phonological cognate interference effect were observed for cognate distracter pictures that are named equally fast as noncognate control distractor pictures (in a separate ”
More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. (2008, background): “…Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript languages at the phonological level (e.g., Hermans et al., 1998; but see Colomé, 2001), because phonological overlap produces facilitation both in bilingual (e.g., Costa et al., 2000; Gollan & Acenas, 2004) and in…”
A UNIFIED MODEL (2007, background): “To overcome entrenchment, learners must rely on resonant processes that allow the fledgling L2 to resist the intrusions of L1, particularly in phonology (Colomé, 2001; Dijkstra, Grainger, & Van Heuven, 1999).”
A Unified Model of Language Acquisition (2004, background): “To overcome entrenchment, learners must rely on resonant processes that allow the fledgling L2 to resist the intrusions of L1, particularly in phonology (Colomé, 2001; Dijkstra, Grainger, & Van Heuven, 1999).”
Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, methodology): “…even phonological attributes of alternatives in the unintended language are active, at least briefly (e.g. Costa, Miozzo and Caramazza, 1999; Hermans, 2000; Colomé, 2001), a focus of research interest and debate concerns the specific locus and manner in which this unintended activity is resolved.”
Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters: The role of expertise and language proficiency (2006, background): “The finding of nonselectivity has been shown to extend to production tasks, even when speakers intend to produce words in only one of their two languages (e.g., Colomé, 2001; Costa, Miozzo, & Caramazza, 1999; Hermans, Bongaerts, De Bot, & Schreuder, 1998).”
The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming (2007, background): “Recently, phonological representations in bilinguals have also received more attention (Colomé, 2001; Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002).”
Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items (2003, neutral): “nates (DeGroot & Nas, 1991; Kroll & Stewart, 1994), and phoneme monitoring (Colome, 2001).”
Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control (2007, background): “, subjects were asked to respond when the name of the picture began with a consonant and to withhold a response for words starting with a vowel, see Colomé (2001), for an earlier behavioural study).”
The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision (2002, background): “, ColomeÂ, A. & SebastiaÂn-GalleÁs, N. (2001). The in ̄uence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12, 445±449. Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition.”
The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “The most compelling evidence supporting the notion of parallel activation of the two languages of a bilingual is that reported by Hermans (2000) and Colomé (2001). In Colomé’s study, Catalan-Spanish participants were asked to decide whether a given phoneme was present in the Catalan name of the targ”
Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies (2008, background): “…is to direct activation to lexical representations in the target language but, as indicated above, there is good evidence that alternative lexico-semantic representations in both languages are active at least briefly (e.g., Colomé, 2001; Costa & Caramaza, 1999; Costa, Miozzo, & Caramazza, 1999).”
Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. (2008, background): “Although there is some debate about the underlying reason for the bilingual disadvantage in lexical retrieval, substantial agreement exists that there is parallel activation of both languages when bilinguals are using one of them (Beauvillain & Grainger, 1987; Brysbaert, Van Dyck, & Van de Poel, 199”
Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning (2013, neutral): “…appear to be active when she reads, hears, and even speaks in only one of her languages (for comprehension: e.g., Spivey & Marian, 1999; Van Heuven, Dijkstra, & Grainger, 1998; for production: e.g., Colomé, 2001; Costa, Miozzo, & Caramazza, 1999; Hermans, Bongaerts, De Bot, & Schreuder, 1998).”
Language switching and language competition (2012, result): “This assumption is supported by studies showing that phonological information in the non-intended language is non-selectively activated during comprehension (e.g. lexical decision task; Dijkstra et al., 1999) and production tasks (e.g. phoneme monitoring tasks; Colomé, 2001).”
Bilingual Minds (2009, neutral): “Evidence for this claim comes from both behavioral (Beauvillain & Grainger, 1987; Colomé, 2001; Grainger, 1993; Hernandez, Bates, & Avila, 1996; Francis, 1999; Kroll & de Groot, 1997) and imaging studies (Marian, Spivey, & Hirsch, 2003; Martin, Dering, Thomas, & Thierry, 2009; Rodriguez-Fornells,…”
Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context* (2013, methodology): “Third, the phoneme-monitoring task that has previously been used in bilingual word-production studies (Colomé, 2001; Hermans et al., 2011; Rodriguez-Fornells et al., 2005; see above) and which may use pictures with noncognate names exclusively is clearly a less natural task than simple picture…”