Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items

By Viorica Marian, Michael J. Spivey. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2003

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5da575d31e1ee2c609abf30e39a711f969fd9ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

FIRST LANGUAGE ACTIVATION DURING SECOND LANGUAGE LEXICAL PROCESSING: An Investigation of Lexical Form, Meaning, and Grammatical Class (2006, background): “…second language ~L2!, information about words in their first language ~L1! is also active ~e+g+, Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002; Jared & Kroll, 2001; Marian & Spivey, 2003!+ From a developmental perspective, finding evidence for language nonselectivity even among highly skilled bilinguals is…”
Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service (2010, result): “This finding was later replicated in several studies by Marian and colleagues (Marian and Spivey, 2003; Marian, Blumenfeld and Boukrina, 2008; Marian, Spivey and Hirsch, 2003), and by Weber and Cutler (2004), although the last only observed an effect of L1 distracters on L2 targets and not vice…”
Bilingual Language Processing and Interference in Bilinguals: Evidence From Eye Tracking and Picture Naming (2007, methodology): “For example, eyetracking technology has been used to demonstrate parallel activation of two languages during bilingual spoken-word recognition (e.g., Ju & Luce, 2004; Marian & Spivey, 2003a, 2003b; Marian, Spivey, & Hirsch, 2003; Weber & Cutler, 2000).”
Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition (2004, methodology): “This may be one reason why our results in Experiment 4 contrast with the findings of Spivey and Marian (1999) and Marian and Spivey (1999, 2003) who found not only lexical activation of the native language interfering with processing of the non-native language, but also interference of the non-nat”
Juggling Two Languages in One Mind (2008, background): “It is beyond the scope of this chapter to review this work in greater detail but we note that evidence for language nonselectivity has also been reported for spoken word recognition in and out of sentence context (e.g., Chambers & Cooke, 2009; Marian & Spivey, 2003).”
Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context* (2013, background): “The display might, for instance, contain a toy shark, a balloon, a toy horse, and a napkin, and a Russian–English bilingual participant may be orally instructed to “pick up the shark” (Marian & Spivey, 2003b).”
Second Language Proficiency and Cross-Language Lexical Activation (2012, methodology): “…in the L2 but not in the L1 in both nonimmersed Dutch-English (Weber & Cutler, 2004) and immersed Spanish-English (Ju & Luce, 2004) bilinguals, but in a different group of immersed bilinguals, Russian-English bilinguals, distractor effects have been found in both L1 and L2 (Marian & Spivey, 2003a).”
Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging (2014, background): “…young adults have demonstrated activation of candidates from both languages simultaneously (termed nonselective access), particularly if the target language is the listener’s L2 (e.g., Blumenfeld & Marian, 2007; Broersma & Cutler, 2011; Canseco-Gonzalez et al., 2010; Marian & Spivey, 2003a, 2003b).”
Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages (2007, background): “There is now compelling evidence that even when bilinguals are exposed to only one language, they cannot avoid activating lexical information of both of their languages (Brysbaert, 1998 ; Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 1998 ; Dijkstra, Van Jaarsveld, & Ten Brinke, 1998 ; Marian & Spivey, 2003 ; Van Heuv”
Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition (2003, methodology): “…up an object whose name in language A was initially phonologically similar to the name of another object in language B, bilingual subjects frequently looked at the cross-linguistic cohort, even when the other language was not being used overtly (Spivey and Marian, 1999; Marian and Spivey, 2003).”