Implications for design

By Paul Dourish. 2006

940 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems (2019, background): “It may also be that careful consideration of and engagement with social contexts concerned with the administration of justice produces insights and lessons learned for other researchers to build on, instead of pre-packaged algorithms stamped with "fairness" [20].”
How HCI interprets the probes (2007, background): “Its originators have expressed considerable concern about the ways in which it has been adopted [19], while some uses of probes have been criticized as poor substitutes for ethnographic and other methods for generating qualitative analyses of the practices of everyday life [13].”
Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse (2007, background): “... are; what matters is why and how they were arrived at, and what kinds of intellectual (and moral and political) commitments they embody, and what kinds of models they reflect.” It also needs to be said that the HCI community is one which has proved itself to be receptive to new ideas and multidi”
Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research (2019, background): “Prior discussions have pointed out instances of how these expectations shape scholarship, such as “implications for design” at CHI [27].”
Designing for appropriation (2007, background): “Dourish describes this as "informal assemblage of steps rather than rote procedure driven by the system" [9].”
When the implication is not to design (technology) (2011, background): “In addition to presenting design implications from their studies, or not [11], researchers should consider potential implications not to design, areas where computing technology might seem applicable, but where results suggest it may be inappropriate (e.g., [35]).”
Qualitative HCI Research: Going Behind the Scenes (2016, background): “Others (e.g., Dourish, 2006) argue that designers need a rich understanding of the situation for which they are designing, and that one of the important roles for ethnography is to expose and describe that context for design, without necessarily making the explicit link to implications for design.”
Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI (2011, methodology): “Throughout this paper, we will refer to epistemology, methodology, and methods as constituting key levels of any approach to data gathering (in this, we are following [26, 55], and in HCI, [17, 7]).”
The Three Paradigms of HCI (2007, background): “The third paradigm researcher would, in general, not seek a single, simple design implication that justified the exploration, but would instead use the thick description to instigate a design process whose outcomes were indeterminate, yet satisfactory (Dourish, 2006).”
HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics (2010, background): “Its primary concern, then, is critical engagement [18].”
Empathy and experience in HCI (2008, background): “Although there are differences between ethnography and cultural probes in the form of dialogue that occurs between researchers and participants [12] and in the difference in weight given to analysis [22], there is nevertheless common ground between them.”
The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research (2008, methodology): “There have also been a number of papers advocating the importance of distinguishing between design and research in HCI (Fallman, 2003; Dourish, 2006; Bartnek, 2007; Wania, Atwood, & McCain, 2006; Taylor, 2003), or that design is an appropriate model for " real " research (Zimmerman et al., 2007),…”
Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks (2012, methodology): “The phenomenon that what a target user says they do in retrospect is only an incomplete match with their actual activities is well-known in psychology [23] and HCI [60]; most users do not accurately introspect about their own data analysis and visualization needs, making these needs invisible to the”
Next steps for value sensitive design (2012, background): “In many instances it may be useful for the reader if the researcher is more visible in the writing – what is his or her background, relation to the participants in the study, and perhaps even relevant personal values [17]? This practice of self-disclosure is standard for example in writing ethnograp”
A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness (2018, background): “In some situations it will also be valuable to use ethnographic approaches to explore participants’ underlying values and extrapolate from those values to technological implications (see [26] for additional discussion of the nature of analytic knowledge that can be gained in ethnographic studies).”
Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking (2007, background): “In the practitioner world, participatory design sought to include workers in the design and redesign of workplaces in the face of increased computerization.(27) The history of the use Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking”
Beyond ethnography: engagement and reciprocity as foundations for design research out here (2014, background): “Before proceeding, it is worth framing the approach in relation to Participatory Design (PD) and Co-Design [16].”