The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research
By Erik Stolterman. 2008
644 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0b6eb7d73ece701229c557d438b9db5e084fcb7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christopher Frauenberger
- William W. Gaver
- Erik Stolterman
- Yubo Kou
- Bryan Battles
- Joseph Hoggatt
- Austin Toombs
- Phoebe Sengers
Citations in the corpus
- Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? (2019, background): “Stolterman [2008] explores the notion of device landscapes, drawing on ANT using networks of connected artefacts in which users are interwoven.”
- An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach (2010, background): “Some in the design research community view RtD as design science [1], while others consider designerly thinking as distinctly separate from scientific thinking [30, 45, 35].”
- What should we expect from research through design? (2012, background): “As Stolterman [31] puts it, 'designers can be prepared-for-action but not guided-inaction by detailed prescriptive procedures' (p 61).”
- The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design (2018, background): “Historically, a lack of communication between HCI practitioners and the academic community has resulted in a gap in knowledge-building and poor resonance between the pragmatic needs of practitioners and available theory and method [37, 66].”