Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking

By Sara Beckman, Michael Barry. 2007

758 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2b1065ea6c5932a54aab1d1b2c171bf10ae88a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

1. J. Liedtka
2. C. Suciu
3. Roy Glen
4. Raphael Amit
5. Tua Björklund
6. X. Han
7. Kara Straker
8. C. Baughn

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Rajiv Kohli
2. C. Suciu
3. Roy Glen
4. Raphael Amit
5. J. Liedtka
6. Tua Björklund
7. X. Han
8. C. Baughn

In Strategy and Management

1. X. Han
2. C. Suciu
3. Roy Glen
4. Raphael Amit
5. J. Liedtka
6. Tua Björklund
7. C. Baughn
8. Boise

Citations in the corpus

• Human-Centered AI (2021, methodology): “Research methods from the fields of design and HCI that are rooted in ethnography provide ways to understand why humans take actions and make the decisions they do, as well as the underlying beliefs that guide their behaviors [7] .”
• Value Creation through Novel Resource Configurations in a Digitally Enabled World (2017, methodology): “Built on design thinking (Beckman & Barry, 2007; Boland & Collopy, 2004; Brown, 2008, 2009), Zott and Amit (2015) propose a process model that centers on how a business model could be designed to create value.”
• Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices (2013, background): “Indeed, the creation or adaption of a fruitful frame has been indentified as a key practice in design and design thinking (Dorst, 2011; Paton & Dorst, 2010; Drews, 2009; Beckman & Barry, 2007), as well as in creative work in general (Hargadon & Bechky, 2006; Schank & Abelson, 1977).”
• Design Thinking pedagogy: the Educational Design Ladder (2015, background): “As do companies around the globe, many educational institutions are required to compete internationally and, therefore, are investing in education systems that emphasise leading through innovation (Beckman & Barry, 2007).”
• Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction (2015, background): “Reflecting on the centrality of its fittedness for dealing with uncertainty as core to the value that design brings, Owen (2007) would later argue that design thinking, in contrast to traditional management approaches, actively avoids making choices for as long as possible in order to maximize learn”
• Adopting Design Thinking in Novice Multidisciplinary Teams: The Application and Limits of Design Methods and Reflexive Practices (2013, background): “The recent emergence of interest in “design thinking” is seen through numerous publications in both practitioner (Brown, 2009; Lockwood, 2010; Martin, 2009) and academic communities (Beckman and Barry, 2007; Ravasi and Lojacono, 2005).”
• The Need for Design Thinking in Business Schools (2014, methodology): “Many pioneering business schools have endorsed design thinking as they search for ways to help their students become more innovative (Beckman & Barry, 2007; Boni, Weingart, & Evenson, 2009; Kimbell, 2011; Liedtka & Ogilvie, 2011).”
• Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, background): “Design thinking also suggests that separating artifacts from their contextual applications is not only unwise but also impossible (Beckman & Barry, 2007), as suggested in the IS literature (Lee, 1999).”