Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI

By Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011

517 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Hal Daumé Iii
2. Christopher Frauenberger

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Alan Borning
2. Neha Kumar
3. Michael J. Muller
4. James A. Fogarty
5. Hal Daumé Iii
6. Hanna M. Wallach
7. Christopher Frauenberger
8. Richard J. Anderson

In Social Sciences & Humanities

1. Hanna M. Wallach
2. Michael J. Muller
3. Neha Kumar
4. Hal Daumé Iii
5. Christopher Frauenberger
6. Darren Gergle
7. Solon Barocas
8. Su Lin Blodgett

Citations in the corpus

• Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (2020, background): “We therefore echo calls by Bardzell and Bardzell (2011), Keyes et al. (2019), and Green (2019) for researchers and practitioners to make their normative reasoning explicit by articulating the social values that underpin their decisions to deem some system behaviors as harmful, no matter how obvious…”
• Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis (2018, background): “There is a growing interest in issues of social justice in HCI, as evidenced by new frameworks and agendas [2,3,23,39,47,48,63,65] that attempt to shift power balances between researchers, society, and marginalized groups.”
• Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? (2019, background): “While in HCI a critical feminist perspective has been prominent [Bardzell 2018; Bardzell and Bardzell 2011; Pierce et al. 2015], performativity as a fundamental ontological commitment has been less so.”
• Next steps for value sensitive design (2012, background): “A second response is to declare the researcher’s position or commitment [4,5,43,44], as is often the case in action research [40], collaborative ethnography [47], grounded theory [17], and participatory design [12,13,55,66].”
• Mobile Phones for Maternal Health in Rural India (2015, background): “Using the lens of feminist HCI [3], we noted both the patriarchal structures that women are subjected to, and the ways in which they exhibit agency regardless.”
• Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools (2017, methodology): “We adopt many aspects of Bardzell and Bardzell’s Feminist HCI methodology [6], such as indicating our goals as technologists in our interactions with participants.”