When the implication is not to design (technology)

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems (2019, background): “But by starting from the technology and working outwards, there is never an opportunity to evaluate whether the technology should be built in the first place [11].”
Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI (2019, background): “Some promising recent work toward these ends include Baumer & Silberman’s proposal not to design [18], or Pierce’s suggestion that we “undesign”—inhibit or foreclose—particular capabilities of technology [113].”
Algorithmic realism: expanding the boundaries of algorithmic thought (2020, background): “While some have recognized that there are contexts in which it is better not to design technology [10], the common”
Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences (2013, background): “However, while respondents’ leaving or limiting was not precipitated by the researchers, this work could be seen as what Baumer and Silberman call “technological extravention” [1], i.”