How HCI interprets the probes

By Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, Paul Dourish. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007

565 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83bc768a6e3d9049e68c64eb50e8f6b2c55b4cce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

The Three Paradigms of HCI (2007, background): “To show that a different paradigm is present we describe some of the contemporary strands of research that are currently marginal to HCI, but that suggest patterns at the edge of the information-processing metaphor and the need to grapple with alternative perspectives.”
Empathy and experience in HCI (2008, background): “The growing interest in experience in HCI has been accompanied by a rich interdisciplinary discourse addressing topics such as the aesthetics of interaction, affective computing, ludic engagement, enchantment with technology, hedonics and so on [12, 24, 30, 32, 40, 52].”
Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI (2010, background): “In the vein of epistemological analyses such as [14,35,45], we aim to show how careful, critical analysis of differing perspectives on research in the field and their relationship to deeper underlying intellectual commitments and trends can benefit HCI by providing reflective scaffolding for future ”
An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach (2010, background): “However, some believe that in the HCI community, methods are often appropriated without respect for and deep knowledge of the underlying methodology [25, 2].”
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts (2023, background): “• Conversation authoring & interaction : Users instruct chatbot behavior with prompts alone (without code) and can observe the efects of their prompts by engaging in conversation with the chatbot.”
Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI (2011, methodology): “Throughout this paper, we will refer to epistemology, methodology, and methods as constituting key levels of any approach to data gathering (in this, we are following [26, 55], and in HCI, [17, 7]).”
Critical Race Theory for HCI (2020, background): “It is respected in qualitative research, critical design (e.g., [13]), and a range of participatory methods (e.g., [26]).”