Variable Very High Energy γ-Ray Emission from Markarian 501

By J. Albert, E. Aliu, H. Anderhub, P. Antoranz, A. Armada, C. Baixeras, J. Barrio, H. Bartko, D. Bastieri, J. Becker and 132 more. 2007

1,245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The blazar Mrk 501 was observed at energies above 0.10 TeV with the MAGIC Telescope from 2005 May through July. The high sensitivity of the instrument enabled the determination of the flux and spectrum of the source on a night-by-night basis. Throughout our observational campaign, the flux from Mrk 501 was found to vary by an order of magnitude. Intranight flux variability with flux-doubling times down to 2 minutes was observed during the two most active nights, namely, June 30 and July 9. These are the fastest flux variations ever observed in Mrk 501. The ~20 minute long flare of July 9 showed an indication of a 4 ± 1 minute time delay between the peaks of F(<0.25 TeV) and F(>1.2 TeV), which may indicate a progressive acceleration of electrons in the emitting plasma blob. The flux variability was quantified for several energy ranges and found to increase with the energy of the γ-ray photons. The spectra hardened significantly with increasing flux, and during the two most active nights, a spectral peak was clearly detected at 0.43 ± 0.06 and 0.25 ± 0.07 TeV, respectively, for June 30 and July 9. There is no evidence of such a spectral feature for the other nights at energies down to 0.10 TeV, thus suggesting that the spectral peak is correlated with the source luminosity. These observed characteristics could be accommodated in a synchrotron self-Compton framework in which the increase in γ-ray flux is produced by a freshly injected (high energy) electron population.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88f41bb85bbc1db7fef81dfaf6f71b5fe3a837ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

THE SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF MONO-ABUNDANCE SUB-POPULATIONS OF THE MILKY WAY DISK (2011, background): “…explanation for the thicker disk components in the Milky Way is that, rather than being thickened over the history of the Galactic disk, thick components were created thick during an early, turbulent phase in the formation of the disk (e.g., Bournaud et al. 2009; Förster Schreiber et al. 2009).”
LEPTONIC AND HADRONIC MODELING OF FERMI-DETECTED BLAZARS (2013, background): “However, the very fast (timescales of a few minutes) variability of some TeV blazars (Albert et al. 2007; Aharonian et al. 2007) poses severe problems for single-zone models of blazars due to the required extremely high bulk Lorentz factors (Begelman et al. 2008).”
THE MOSFIRE DEEP EVOLUTION FIELD (MOSDEF) SURVEY: REST-FRAME OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPY FOR ∼1500 H-SELECTED GALAXIES AT 1.37 ≤ z ≤ 3.8 ?> (2014, background): “A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 1179–1186 Siana, B., Smail, I., Swinbank, A. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1273 Silverman, J. D., Kashino, D., Arimoto, N., et al. 2014, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1409.0447 Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Momcheva, I. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 214, 24 Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, K”
Ionized gas outflows and global kinematics of low-z luminous star-forming galaxies (2014, methodology): “…the velocity dispersion and the star formation density by combining a large amount of data for SFGs at z∼ 1.5-3 obtained by several authors (Forster-Schreiber et al. 2006, 2009; Genzel et al. 2006, 2008; Cresci et al. 2009; Wright et al. 2007; Starkenburg et al 2009; Epinat et al. 2009;…”
Toy models for galaxy formation versus simulations (2013, background): “This suite of galaxies spans the mass range of typical observed massive star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 2 (Förster Schreiber et al. 2009), and otherwise no major selection criteria was imposed on their properties at z ∼ 2 − 4.”
Alpha element abundances and gradients in the Milky Way bulge from FLAMES-GIRAFFE spectra of 650 K giants (2011, background): “At z ∼ 2 a widespread population exists of large, rotating disk galaxies, with much higher gas fractions and velocity dispersion compared to local spirals (Genzel et al. 2006, 2008; Förster Schreiber et al. 2009; Tacconi et al. 2010; Daddi et al. 2010).”
The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey final data release: a spectroscopic sample of 35 016 galaxies and AGN out to z ~ 6.7 selected with 17.5 ≤ iAB ≤ 24.75 (2013, methodology): “…significance of integral field spectroscopy studies of high-redshift galaxies at z ∼> 1 using the Hα line redshifted into the infrared (e.g. Forster-Schreiber et al. 2009; Epinat et al. 2009; Law et al. 2009; Contini et al. 2012) fully depends on the quality of the parent spectroscopic redshift…”
Implications of very rapid TeV variability in blazars (2007, background): “The shortest variability timescales that have been measured to date in PKS 2155–304 (Aharonian et al. 2007) and Mrk 501 (Albert et al. 2007a) are 3–5 minutes, so we set tvar = 300t5 s.”
MOST SUBMILLIMETER GALAXIES ARE MAJOR MERGERS (2010, methodology): “High-redshift galaxies are clumpy and irregular, which may either be the result of on-going mergers (Lotz et al. 2006; Conselice et al. 2008), or the consequence of clumpy star formation in a kinematically more coherent structure such as an underlying rotating disk (Förster-Schreiber et al. 2006, 2”
THE MILKY WAY HAS NO DISTINCT THICK DISK (2011, background): “Discerning the mechanism that leads to the thickness distribution of galactic disks is important in constraining the rate of minor mergers, the resilience of stellar disks to such mergers, and the importance of ‘internal’ heating mechanisms such as radial migration (Sellwood & Binney 2002) or turbul”
BULGE GROWTH AND QUENCHING SINCE z = 2.5 IN CANDELS/3D-HST (2014, background): “As the SINS survey of z ∼ 2 galaxy kinematics demonstrated that high-redshift SFGs are dynamically (Förster Schreiber et al. 2009) and morphologically (Förster Schreiber et al. 2011) distinct from local spiral galaxies, we caution that bulge fractions as derived by our decompositions may have a…”
THE COSMIC BPT DIAGRAM: CONFRONTING THEORY WITH OBSERVATIONS (2013, methodology): “At z ∼ 2.5, we use 5 galaxies from the SINS sample (Förster Schreiber et al. 2009), 2 zCOSMOS galaxies (Maier et al. 2013, in prep), the low metallicity L∗ galaxy (Q2343-BX418) from Erb et al. (2010), and 16 gravitationally lensed galaxies from the compilations of Richard et al. (2011), Yuan et…”
MINUTE-TIMESCALE >100 MeV γ-RAY VARIABILITY DURING THE GIANT OUTBURST OF QUASAR 3C 279 OBSERVED BY FERMI-LAT IN 2015 JUNE (2016, background): “These timescales are comparable to the shortest variability timescales detected above 100 GeV in a handful of blazars and a radio galaxy by ground-based Cherenkov telescopes (PKS 2155−304, Aharonian et al. 2007; Mrk 501, Albert et al. 2007; IC 310, Aleksić et al. 2014).”
SMOOTH(ER) STELLAR MASS MAPS IN CANDELS: CONSTRAINTS ON THE LONGEVITY OF CLUMPS IN HIGH-REDSHIFT STAR-FORMING GALAXIES (2012, background): “…of SFGs at z ∼ 1 − 2, even in- 2 cluding those with irregular morphologies, is dominated by ordered disk rotation (see, e.g., Genzel et al. 2006; Förster Schreiber et al. 2006, 2009; Shapiro et al. 2008; Epinat et al. 2012), unlike what would be expected in the case of frequent (major) merging…”
BLACK HOLE GROWTH AND ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI OBSCURATION BY INSTABILITY-DRIVEN INFLOWS IN HIGH-REDSHIFT DISK GALAXIES FED BY COLD STREAMS (2011, background): “Stellar feedback is unlikely to be the main driver of the turbulence, e.g., because the velocity dispersion is not observed to be tightly correlated with proximity to star-forming clumps (Förster Schreiber et al. 2009; Genzel et al. 2011).”
A CANDELS–3D-HST SYNERGY: RESOLVED STAR FORMATION PATTERNS AT 0.7 < z < 1.5 (2013, background): “…Förster Schreiber et al. 2011a,b; Wuyts et al. 2011b, 2012; Guo et al. 2012; A. van der Wel et al. in prep) and ground-based kinematic measurements (e.g., Genzel et al. 2006; Förster Schreiber et al. 2009, 2013; Lemoine-Busserolle & Lamareille 2010; Wisnioski et al. 2011; Epinat et al. 2012).”