Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates

By G. Tonsor, N. Olynk, C. Wolf. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2009

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aa5ad8c0f093828e9016d222c50d86128179e58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Olynk
2. F. Norwood
3. Jayson L. Lusk
4. David L. Ortega
5. H. H. Wang
6. Laping Wu
7. G. Tonsor
8. Jackson Loomis

In Plant Science

1. David L. Ortega
2. Jayson L. Lusk
3. F. Norwood
4. H. H. Wang
5. Laping Wu
6. N. Olynk

In Small Animals

1. Jayson L. Lusk
2. F. Norwood
3. David L. Ortega
4. H. H. Wang
5. Laping Wu
6. N. Olynk

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China (2011, methodology): “RPL and LCM are being increasingly used in applied economic research as two alternative approaches to account for differences in consumer preferences (Tonsor et al., 2009).”
• Animal Welfare Economics (2011, methodology): “…thus whether one is in need of more than consumers’ “private” values associated with their own willingness-to-pay) was proposed by Carlsson et al. (2007a) in the context of genetically modified food and applied to the topic of animal welfare by Carlsson et al. (2007b) and Tonsor et al. (2009a).”