The impact of offering two versus three alternatives in choice modelling experiments

By John Rolfe, Jeffrey Bennett. 2009

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6002bfdb0b61af4d87a4d864e66386276406c25f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Hanley
2. Riccardo Scarpa
3. Kevin J. Boyle
4. Roy Brouwer
5. Jeffrey Bennett
6. Christian A. Vossler
7. R. Johnston
8. Wiktor L. Adamowicz

In General Decision Sciences

1. N. Hanley
2. Riccardo Scarpa
3. Kevin J. Boyle
4. Christian A. Vossler
5. Jeffrey Bennett
6. Roy Brouwer
7. M. Ryan
8. T. Cameron

In Transportation

1. Riccardo Scarpa
2. M. Ryan
3. Kevin J. Boyle
4. N. Hanley
5. Jeffrey Bennett
6. S. B. Olsen
7. Stephane Hess

Citations in the corpus

• Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Rolfe and Bennett (2009) found that binary-choice CE formats led to greater rates of serial nonparticipation, compared to multinomial-choice formats.”