Jackson Loomis

Economics and Econometrics · 2000–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 17 papers; trusts 48 researchers and is trusted by 43 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Jackson Loomis trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. John A. List
  2. Jayson L. Lusk
  3. Richard T. Carson
  4. Joseph M. Little
  5. John C. Whitehead
  6. Mark Morrison
  7. Glenn W. Harrison
  8. Christian A. Vossler
  9. Thomas Brown
  10. James J. Murphy

Who trusts Jackson Loomis overall

  1. G. Atkinson
  2. Julie M. Mueller
  3. R. Johnston
  4. Sheila M. Olmstead
  5. S. Mourato
  6. S. McCoy
  7. M. Barrio
  8. Ian J. Bateman
  9. Maamar Sebri
  10. S. B. Olsen

Papers from Jackson Loomis's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jackson Loomis trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?
  2. A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
  3. Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment
  4. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions
  5. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation
  6. Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
  7. Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis
  8. Estimating Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias
  9. A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum
  10. Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks

Their papers