Trait Inferences as a Function of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions

By Michael A. Olson, R. Fazio. 2004

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19c32aecae74a33e1b23a3684f6c9b8a69902b0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Automatically activated racial attitudes as predictors of the success of interracial roommate relationships (2006, unknown): “Past research has found that individuals sometimes correct for the influence of their automatically activated attitudes on various race-related judgments if characterized by a motivation to do so (e.g., Dunton & Fazio, 1997; Fazio & Dunton, 1997; Olson & Fazio, 2004; Towles-Schwen & Fazio, 2003).”
What moderates implicit—explicit consistency? (2005, background): “Likewise, Payne et al. (2005) reported that only internal motivation moderated the consistency between an implicit affect misattribution measure and self-reported feelings towards Blacks. These findings suggest that adjustment to internal standards may be a stronger moderator than adjustment to exte”
Saying no to negativity: The effects of context and motivation to control prejudice on automatic evaluative responses (2005, background): “First, a variety of research has demonstrated that MCPR can influence racerelevant responses on controlled or explicit measures (e.g., Dunton & Fazio, 1997; Olson & Fazio, 2004; Plant & Devine, 1998; Towles-Schwen & Fazio, 2003).”
On implicit–explicit consistency: the moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment (2005, background): “enhance or compromise the validity of the implicit indicator (see Figure 1). Some sources of contamination have recently been demonstrated for the IAT, such as cognitive skill confounds (Mierke & Klauer, 2003) or extra-personal associations ( Olson & Fazio, 2004 ).”
When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, background): “In separate sessions, Olson and Fazio (2004a) had participants complete the MCPR and an evaluative priming procedure (Fazio et al., 1995) on automatically activated attitudes about Blacks.”
Getting Explicit About the Implicit (2012, background): “…significantly with explicit measures (Nosek, 2005), interact in meaningful ways with explicit attitudes and motives (Dasgupta & Rivera, 2006; Olson & Fazio, 2004b; Towles-Schwen & Fazio, 2003), and are affected by manipulations designed to influence personal attitudes (e.g., manipulations…”