Corpora in Applied Linguistics
By P. Kaszubski. 2003
662 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/185d856d7661d84f0c9c94b787e44f3ac411d0d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching (2011, background): “Like Hunston and Francis (2000), I see a necessity in and “look forward to [more] information about patterns being incorporated in language teaching materials.”
- A corpus linguistics study of SMS text messaging (2009, background): “1 See, for example, Hunston and Francis‘ (2000) pattern grammar.”
- Not just ‘small potatoes’: Knowledge of the idiomatic meanings of collocations (2017, background): “They found that the learners used high frequency collocations extensively, but failed to use those that were less frequent but strongly associated (MI score > 3; Hunston, 2002).”
- Pointing Out Frequent Phrasal Verbs: A Corpus‐Based Analysis (2007, background): “High-powered computers, robust software, and large electronic collections of actual language (called corpora; singular, corpus) have enabled researchers to better identify and classify these otherwise elusive structures that permeate English as well as many other languages (Hunston, 2002; Moon, 1997”
- Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. (2017, background): “DDL’s focus on context may mean that it is difficult to acquire the large numbers of words that spring to mind when thinking of vocabulary, while at the other end of the scale DDL may be “difficult to reconcile with the ‘big themes’ of language teaching” such as grammar (Hunston, 2002, p. 184).”
- Can Learners Use Concordance Feedback for Writing Errors (2004, background): “Since then, corpus and concordance have become a main topic in applied linguistics and language teaching (e.g., Hunston, 2002), and yet only a few small-scale studies have added anything to the empirical base for corpus-based learning (e.g., Bowker, 1999, study of the effect of concordancing on…”
- Using a Corpus-Based Lexicogrammatical Approach to Grammar Instruction in EFL and ESL Contexts. (2009, background): “Corpus concordance not only makes accessible an enormous amount of authentic language input but also creates various inductive and deductive language learning opportunities not available in the past (Aston, 2001; Conrad, 2000; Francis, 1993; Hunston, 2002; Hunston & Francis, 1998; Johns, 1994; Sincl”
- Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near Synonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (2006, background): “Partington (1998: 68), Stubbs (2001a: 449) and Hunston (2002: 142) appear to take it for granted that semantic prosody is connotational, while Louw (2000: 49–50) explicitly argues that ‘semantic prosodies are not merely connotational’ as ‘the force behind SPs [semantic prosodies] is more strongly co”
- Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts (2004, background): “Based on her analysis of large written corpora in E nglish, Hunston (2002) comments that the uses of the past tense are mostly associated with narratives, and the present tense with formal academic prose that deals with generalizations, observations, or descriptions.”
- From key words to key semantic domains (2008, neutral): “The key word approach taken by Scott is the most finds key words as follows: Some researchers use the concept of key words in a different way: their key facts about a community” (Hunston 2002:117).”
- Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study (2017, methodology): “A collocation was operationalized in the present study as a lexically or syntactically prefabricated chunk, based on the phraseological (Cowie, 1981) rather than the statistical-frequency approach (Hunston, 2002; Hunston & Francis, 2000; Sinclair, 1991).”