Disentangling Robust Developmental Constraints From the Instructionally Mutable: Young Children's Epistemic Reasoning About a Study of Their Own Design
By Kathleen E. Metz. 2011
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17fb1d6589c097535a040f01f1bd65442429e42b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
- Eve Manz
- David M. Hammer
- Ivar Bråten
- Ying‐Chih Chen
- Brian Hand
- William A. Sandoval
- Lori A. Norton-Meier
In Education
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
- Eve Manz
- David M. Hammer
- Ivar Bråten
- Ying‐Chih Chen
- Brian Hand
- William A. Sandoval
- Lori A. Norton-Meier
Citations in the corpus
- Teacher Roles of Questioning in Early Elementary Science Classrooms: A Framework Promoting Student Cognitive Complexities in Argumentation (2017, background): “In addition, the opportunities for early elementary students (grade 1–3) to participate in scientific argumentation are rare because young children are often assumed to have limited scientific reasoning abilities, process skills, and the conceptual knowledge necessary to engage in scientific practic”
- Resistance and the Development of Scientific Practice: Designing the Mangle Into Science Instruction (2015, background): “Several researchers adopt this view, advocating the importance of engaging students in “getting a grip” on the material world (Lehrer, Schauble, & Lucas, 2008), or “structuring the ill-structured” (Metz, 2011).”
- Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom (2012, result): “This view, of course, is extensively supported in the literature (e.g. Sodian et al., 1991; Koslowski, 1996; Tytler & Peterso, 2004; Metz, 2011); below we document the productive beginnings of reasoning about energy that emerged in one instance of responsive teaching.”
- Understanding and Promoting Thinking About Knowledge (2016, background): “In elementary classrooms, intervention work in science (e.g., Metz, 2011; Ryu & Sandoval, 2012), mathematics (e.g., Mason & Scrivani, 2004; Verschaffel et al., 1999), history (Nokes, 2014; VanSledright, 2002), and language arts (Reznitskaya et al., 2012) suggests how engagement in scaffolded…”