Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships: A Quantitative Analysis of Consumer Research Findings

By Jay P. Carlson, Leslie H. Vincent, D. Hardesty, W. O. Bearden. 2009

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14c254bf5feda58f55ed119374b4e0a53a4eebbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Wim Verbeke
2. Joris Aertsens
3. Z. Pieniak
4. Tae-Im Han
5. N. Carmi
6. Jenny van Doorn
7. Philip M. Fernbach
8. G. Van Huylenbroeck

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Jenny van Doorn
2. Philip M. Fernbach
3. Steven A. Sloman
4. Shelley J. Correll
5. N. Orion
6. S. Soule
7. Chris Janiszewski
8. Leslie Stoel

In Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

1. Wim Verbeke
2. Chris Janiszewski

Citations in the corpus

• Subjective and objective knowledge as determinants of organic vegetables consumption (2010, background): “Hence, it can be expected that such objective knowledge scores contain greater bias resulting from possible guessing (Carlson et al., 2009; Vanhuele & Dreze, 2002).”
• Gender differences in financial risk taking: The role of financial literacy and risk tolerance☆ (2016, unknown): “Similar procedures are well-known from studies of, e.g., voting behavior or consumer research (McDonald and Tolbert, 2012; Carlson et al., 2009).”
• The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food (2011, background): “6 (Carlson et al., 2009; Klerck and Sweeney, 2007; Feick et al., 1992; Brucks, 1985).”
• The Desire for Consumption Knowledge (2013, result): “Consistent with prior research (Carlson et al. 2009), the two scales were significantly correlated (r p .”
• Coproduction of Transformative Services as a Pathway to Improved Consumer Well-Being (2015, background): “This distinction is consistent with research that separates what consumers know objectively from what they (subjectively) think they know (Alba and Hutchinson 2000; Carlson et al. 2009).”
• Gender Inequality in Product Markets: When and How Status Beliefs Transfer to Products (2017, background): “Indeed, the consumer marketing literature has reported substantial variations across studies in regard to the relationship among subjective and objective knowledge (Carlson et al. 2009).”
• Explaining Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Theory of Planned Behavior (2017, background): “Consumers’ purchase behaviors are greatly influenced by product categories because product attributes, outcome benefits, and purchase experiences vary across these categories (Carlson et al. 2009; Low and Lamb 2000).”
• Transforming Environmental Knowledge Into Behavior: The Mediating Role of Environmental Emotions (2015, background): “House et al. (2004) and Carlson et al. (2009) also distinguished between objective knowledge (accurate stored information) and subjective knowledge (an individual’s perception of his or her own knowledge).”
• Explanation Fiends and Foes: How Mechanistic Detail Determines Understanding and Preference (2013, result): “A critical lesson from this work is that true understanding of a causal mechanism and a sense that one understands it are often dissociated, a theme that is analogous to investigations in several areas of consumer research documenting dissociations between objective and subjective knowledge (Alba an”